Hi,
anybody has an experience how is stable postgresql under Windows system ?
I tried postgresq 7.1 under Cygwin, Windows 98 and was dissapointed
by very bad performance. Are there something I could tune ?
I got 250 sel/sec on simple select from table with 500 rows !
Under Linux I have 2500 sel/s
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anybody has an experience how is stable postgresql under Windows system ?
> I tried postgresq 7.1 under Cygwin, Windows 98 and was dissapointed
> by very bad performance. Are there something I could tune ?
> I got 250 sel/sec on simple select from table
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> anybody has an experience how is stable postgresql
under Windows
system ?
> I tried postgresq 7.1 under Cygwin, Windows 98 and
was dissapointed
> by very bad performance.
As you might guess, Cygwin's speed depends heavily on
the version of Windows yo
Try using NT. I use 98 for development but it just drops the ball to
much for me to consider it for production (I've never had the regression
tests complete on 98, mind you I havn't tried particularly hard either). If
there is anyplace I would expect performance difference it would be in
c
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> anybody has an experience how is stable postgresql under Windows system ?
> I tried postgresq 7.1 under Cygwin, Windows 98 and was dissapointed
> by very bad performance. Are there something I could tune ?
> I got 250 sel/sec on simple select from table
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> even worse, we have to port our application to Windows and it should
> run under W95..XP on different hardware (PII ...). It'll run in
> single-user environment (thank goodness). Database will have about
> 20-30 K rows.
Ugh. Why pay for an OS these day
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Andy Ruhl wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
> > anybody has an experience how is stable postgresql under Windows system ?
> > I tried postgresq 7.1 under Cygwin, Windows 98 and was dissapointed
> > by very bad performance. Are there something I could tune ?
hug... wakala...
I have PostgreSQL running in several boxes, since a clonic PIII400 , two
NetVista PIII800 and two NetFinity PIII 550.
All of them are Linux boxes, and obviously there are some performance
diferences related to the hardware, so I try hack hard to get best
performance posible in e
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 30 January 2002 17:58
> > To: Oleg Bartunov
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pgsql Hackers
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > Who is this guy ? What I can do to get more preformance ?
> > Is't possible to compile 7.2 sources under Cygwin ? Do I need
> > to do something special ?
>
> Yes you can compile it yourself under Cygwin, but there's not really any
> point that I can see
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I can do to get more preformance ?
Sounds like the answer is "stop using Windows 98".
Now that Dave mentions it, I do recall that it was Great Bridge's
people who had gotten pretty much the same numbers from their TPC-C
benchmark on Cygwin as on L
11 matches
Mail list logo
