On 8/16/11 10:24 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
I can't let this slide :-D
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Evan Rempel wrote:
Technically it can be done, but just because we can do something does not
mean we should do something. Having said that...
We have been using a middleware product that shal
I want to use the postgresql for exactly the same use. I want to keep my
database separate and use another postgresql machine just as application
server. Even for load balancing and scaling we can use many techniques mixed
to get the work done.
Chaitanya Kulkarni
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:55 PM,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> one point that is getting lost in all this that if you are using a
> database for an application server, this does not mean it's the same
> database as your main database or even on the same machine -- you can
> still keep traditional separ
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Evan Rempel wrote:
> Technically it can be done, but just because we can do something does not
> mean we should do something. Having said that...
>
> We have been using a middleware product that shall remain nameless,
> that goes against a large commercial databas
I can't let this slide :-D
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Evan Rempel wrote:
> Technically it can be done, but just because we can do something does not
> mean we should do something. Having said that...
>
> We have been using a middleware product that shall remain nameless,
> that goes against
On Aug 13, 2011, at 2:44 PM, s...@bestmx.ru wrote:
> c k wrote:
>> Yes, I know that I can not create a simple web application using only
>> postgresql because we need a web server to server the html content.
> u r wrong.
> u CAN!
>
> there is nginx_htttp_postgresql_module
> exactly to connect w
