Re: [SQL] [ADMIN] Syslog

2002-03-14 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hackers: Is there any reason to NOT make --enable-syslog the default > any more? > I.E. can we change the sense of it to be --disable-syslog and have > USE_SYSLOG defined by default? I thought we'd agreed to do that already; at least Peter had indica

Re: [SQL] [ADMIN] Syslog

2002-03-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 14 Mar 2002 21:17:05 + "Oliver Elphick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 20:13, Jie Liang wrote: > > I did everything as you did, however, when start the postmaster, > > I got following: > > FATAL 1:'syslog' is not a valid option name. > > Then you haven't configured

Re: [SQL] [ADMIN] Syslog

2002-03-14 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 20:13, Jie Liang wrote: > I did everything as you did, however, when start the postmaster, > I got following: > FATAL 1: 'syslog' is not a valid option name. Then you haven't configured postgresql with --enable-syslog. (That message comes from src/backend/utils/misc/gu

Re: [SQL] [ADMIN] Syslog

2002-03-14 Thread Dan Langille
On 14 Mar 2002 at 10:48, Joe Conway wrote: > Jie Liang wrote: > > In postgresql.conf: > > # Syslog > > # requires ENABLE_SYSLOG > > How to do it? > > My OS is FreeBSD4.5 > > I installed Postgres-7.2 > > > > > > Urgent! Try not to think that your message is more important than any othe