I haven't looked in great detail into why this is happpening, but it
seems as though processNamePattern() doesn't handle ?'s correctly in
the negative lookahead context correctly.
Negative lookahead context!? You are several sigmas beyond the subset
of regex functionality that \d and friends are i
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't looked in great detail into why this is happpening, but it
> seems as though processNamePattern() doesn't handle ?'s correctly in
> the negative lookahead context correctly.
Negative lookahead context!? You are several sigmas beyond the su
I haven't looked in great detail into why this is happpening, but it
seems as though processNamePattern() doesn't handle ?'s correctly in
the negative lookahead context correctly.
1) \dn [pattern] strips ?'s and replaces them with periods. This may
be intentional (as the comment in describe.c
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1101
Logged by: bujji babu
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4
Operating system: windows2000
Description:install-error
Details:
i am installing cygwin in windows2000
now, i want to ru
