Prezado Senhor
Estou tentando instalar o Postgresql 8.0 em um Pc com Windows 2000. Qdo chega na parte de definir usuario( conta), dominio e senha, aparece os seguintes erros:
1) conta já existe
OU
2) conflito de mapeamento entre as contas
O que devo fazer?
Qdo tento instalar não optando
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1857
Logged by: Cleber Nardelli
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.3
Operating system: Windows XP Professional (Client) RedHat 9 Linux (Server)
Description:Problem with driver ODBC
Details:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:53:24PM +0100, Cleber Nardelli wrote:
> BEGIN TRANSACTION;
> DELETE FROM TABL1 WHERE ID = 1;
> INSERT INTO TABL1 VALUES (1,1);
> SAVEPOINT SVPT;
> INSERT INTO TABL1 VALUES (1,1);
> ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT SPVT;
> COMMIT;
>
> When I try to insert as register it a
Tom,
> Can you point to any single one of the past five major releases in which
> psql's backslash commands *WERE* completely backwards-compatible with
> previous versions of PostgreSQL? This is not breaking news.
Because this is the first time I can remember where *none* of the \ commands
work
Josh Berkus writes:
> Hmmm ... how difficult would it be to give a useful error message instead of
> a
> SQL error? Something like:
> "I'm sorry, that PSQL command did not work. Most likely, you are connecting
> to a different version of PostgreSQL."
Well, "useful" is in the eye of the beho
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:05:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I like this better than Bruce's recent proposal to print a warning at
> psql startup, because it emits the info when you actually need it.
> How many people pay attention to psql's startup banner at all?
Aren't there other compatability i
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:05:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I like this better than Bruce's recent proposal to print a warning at
>> psql startup, because it emits the info when you actually need it.
>> How many people pay attention to psql's startup ba
""tk"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 1856
> Logged by: tk
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 7.0.3
> Operating system: linux
> Description:chinese sort error
> Details:
>
> chinese sort e
Folks,
I'd swear somebody committed a fix for the issue with temp tables inside
plpgsql functions, like, months ago. Yet I still get:
ERROR: relation with OID 16607 does not exist
CONTEXT: SQL statement "INSERT INTO tmp_runs ( run_id, batch, machine )
VALUES ( NEXTVAL('runs_run_id_seq'), $1
Josh Berkus writes:
> I'd swear somebody committed a fix for the issue with temp tables inside
> plpgsql functions, like, months ago.
Nope.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your fr
10 matches
Mail list logo
