Re: [BUGS] BUG #3901: Received error

2008-01-24 Thread Gurjeet Singh
It sure looks like Postgres's ASSERT failure. And mcxt.c is Postgres' memory management module. Can you please figure out, and try to reproduce what were you (or your app) doing when this happened. Best regards, On Jan 24, 2008 12:37 PM, Chris Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The follo

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3901: Received error

2008-01-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Chris Hoover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just received this error on my command line. I think this came from > postgres as it is the only app running on this server. I am not sure what > caused this since the server was idle. > TRAP: BadArgument("!(((header->context) != ((void *)0) && > ((

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3900: 0 byte .log files created when not using strerr

2008-01-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Chris Hoover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am using the syslog and csvlog options in my postgresql.conf. I am > rotating the logs every hour, and every hour I get a growing .csv file in > the log_destination along with a 0 byte .log file. Since I am not logging > to stderr, the .log file shou

Re: [BUGS] Statement Timeout Message Incorrect

2008-01-24 Thread Tom Lane
elein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So a '1d' (86400 seconds) statement timeout should not be a problem as it > is not too large. Indeed. It's a bug that this fails. What's your point? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--

[BUGS] BUG #3900: 0 byte .log files created when not using strerr

2008-01-24 Thread Chris Hoover
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3900 Logged by: Chris Hoover Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.3.rc2 Operating system: RHES 4.0 Description:0 byte .log files created when not using strerr Details: I am using the syslog a

[BUGS] BUG #3901: Received error

2008-01-24 Thread Chris Hoover
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3901 Logged by: Chris Hoover Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.3.rc2 Operating system: RHES 4.0 Description:Received error Details: I just received this error on my command line. I think

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3898: Postgres autovacuum not respecting pg_autovacuum.enabled = false

2008-01-24 Thread Steven Flatt
On 1/23/08, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Steven Flatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I noticed that the Postgres autovacuum process was vacuuming some tables > > that had enabled = false in pg_autovacuum. > > I think what is happening is that because you set > pg_autovacuum.freeze_max_a

Re: [BUGS] Statement Timeout Message Incorrect

2008-01-24 Thread elein
> >>From: Tom Lane > >>To: elein > >>Subject: Re: Statement Timeout Message Incorrect > >>Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:52:35 -0500 > >>elein writes: > >>> Running 8.3RC1 > >>> I have an sql script where one or more create index statements > >>> raise a statement timeout message. The statement timeo

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3897: plJava dll still doesn't load

2008-01-24 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi. - Original Message - From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Jan 24, 2008 11:50 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 24, 2008 11:16 AM, Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 8.2.6 will not be repackaged, so the official fix will be in 8.2.7 which > has not yet be

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3897: plJava dll still doesn't load

2008-01-24 Thread Magnus Hagander
> > > 8.2.6 will not be repackaged, so the official fix will be in 8.2.7 which > > > has not yet been scheduled. > > > > I do intend to re-package 8.2.6, just haven't found the time yet. I > > *might* be able to later today. > > I managed to squeeze it in between some other stuff. It's on the > se

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3897: plJava dll still doesn't load

2008-01-24 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 24, 2008 11:50 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 11:16 AM, Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 8.2.6 will not be repackaged, so the official fix will be in 8.2.7 which > > has not yet been scheduled. > > I do intend to re-package 8.2.6, just haven't found t

Re: [BUGS] Windows setup Error RC2

2008-01-24 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:19:19PM +0100, Gevik Babakhani wrote: > I am trying to install 82.RC2 using mstsc client on a Remote Win 2003 > server. > on page "initialize database cluster" with: > > Locale:C > Encoding server:UTF8 > Encoding client:UTF8 > superuser:postgres > password:postgres > ini

Re: [BUGS] Windows setup Error RC2

2008-01-24 Thread Gevik Babakhani
typo there, it should be 8.3RC2 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gevik Babakhani > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:19 PM > To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org > Subject: [BUGS] Windows setup Error RC2 > > I am trying to install 82.RC2

[BUGS] Windows setup Error RC2

2008-01-24 Thread Gevik Babakhani
I am trying to install 82.RC2 using mstsc client on a Remote Win 2003 server. on page "initialize database cluster" with: Locale:C Encoding server:UTF8 Encoding client:UTF8 superuser:postgres password:postgres init dbcluster check: checked When clicked on Next, the following error pops up. "Erro

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3897: plJava dll still doesn't load

2008-01-24 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 24, 2008 11:16 AM, Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, David Gradwell wrote: > > > Bug reference: 3897 > > PostgreSQL version: 8.3rc2 > > Operating system: Windows Server 2003 > > Description:plJava dll still doesn't load > > Details: > > > > I've

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3897: plJava dll still doesn't load

2008-01-24 Thread Kris Jurka
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, David Gradwell wrote: Bug reference: 3897 PostgreSQL version: 8.3rc2 Operating system: Windows Server 2003 Description:plJava dll still doesn't load Details: I've successfully installed plJava on postgres 8.2.6 using Kris Jurka's version at http://www.ejurk

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3898: Postgres autovacuum not respecting pg_autovacuum.enabled = false

2008-01-24 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 00:01 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > IMO it's a usability bug which will be gone when we move to > pg_class.reloptions -- you won't need to set random values for options > you don't know what to set to. But this is a problem in *this* release (and the last also?). > As for