On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Ricardo Fuentes wrote:
> Hello, i want to subscribe to this lists
>
Hi Ricardo,
Here is the link to subscribe.
http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/
Regards,
Itishree
Hello,
I made some further investigations.
It seems that my problem was related with my new server hostname.
He was named ctrl_cochise which does not conform to standards.
After renaming to ctrlcochise I have not been able to reproduce my problems.
Something strange is that I was not able
Sir,
I have changed Antivirus environment from AVG to Avast .
After I have tried to restart my PostgreSQL Server I got 10061 error TCP/IP.
Starting the server triggers err 5 ''Access denied''
After this missfaillure I have uninstalled PostgreSQL 8.3. and then I have
tried to riinstall Postg
trainee wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 4694
> Logged by: trainee
> Email address: traine...@163.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.6
> Operating system: windows xp
> Description:uppercase path cause postgres can't start
> Details:
>
To Whom It My Concern,
I am a member of a small group using PostgreSQL has a data backend and
I writing to request and MD5 checksum for PostgreSQL 8.7.3.
If an MD5 is not available, I would appreciate the location of an RPM
for 8.7.3, if there is one available.
Thank you very much for your as
Dafina.Abernathy wrote:
To Whom It My Concern,
I am a member of a small group using PostgreSQL has a data backend
and I writing to request and MD5 checksum for PostgreSQL 8.7.3.
If an MD5 is not available, I would appreciate the location of an RPM
for 8.7.3, if there is one available.
Thank
Hello Mr. Pierce,
You are correct it is for version 8.3.7. for Redhat. My apologies for
the mix-up.
A member of the group has checked http://yums.postgresql.org and was
unable to locate an RPM for Redhat.
If there is one available, I would be most appreciative if you provided
the link.
Thank
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Dafina.Abernathy
wrote:
> Hello Mr. Pierce,
>
> You are correct it is for version 8.3.7. for Redhat. My apologies for the
> mix-up.
> A member of the group has checked http://yums.postgresql.org and was unable
> to locate an RPM for Redhat.
> If there is one availa
John R Pierce wrote:
Dafina.Abernathy wrote:
I am a member of a small group using PostgreSQL has a data backend
and I writing to request and MD5 checksum for PostgreSQL 8.7.3.
If an MD5 is not available, I would appreciate the location of an RPM
for 8.7.3, if there is one available.
Thank you
Dafina.Abernathy wrote:
Hello Mr. Pierce,
You are correct it is for version 8.3.7. for Redhat. My apologies for
the mix-up.
A member of the group has checked http://yums.postgresql.org and was
unable to locate an RPM for Redhat.
"Redhat" describes a dozen versions of Linux and a half dozen
Dafina,
I am a member of a small group using PostgreSQL has a data backend and I
writing to request and MD5 checksum for PostgreSQL 8.7.3.
If an MD5 is not available, I would appreciate the location of an RPM
for 8.7.3, if there is one available.
Thank you very much for your assistance in this m
Sorry for the confusion and ambiguity of the request. The files we are
requesting the MD5 checksum for are located here:
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.3.7/linux/rpms/redhat/rhel-4-i386/
Thanks!
P. Scott Hill
Software Engineer, Web Development Group
National Coastal Data Development
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4748
Logged by: Roman Kononov
Email address: kono...@ftml.net
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7
Operating system: GNU/Linux x86_64
Description:hash join and sort-merge join make different results
Details:
test-std=# c
Roman Kononov wrote:
> Description:hash join and sort-merge join make different results
> Details:
>
> test-std=# create table t(s int,i interval);
> CREATE TABLE
> test-std=# insert into t values (0,'30 days'), (1,'1 month');
> INSERT 0 2
> test-std=# select * from t as a, t as b where
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Roman Kononov wrote:
>
>> Description: hash join and sort-merge join make different results
>> Details:
>>
>> test-std=# create table t(s int,i interval);
>> CREATE TABLE
>> test-std=# insert into t values (0,'30 days'), (1,'1 month');
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Roman Kononov wrote:
>> Description:hash join and sort-merge join make different results
>> Details:
>>
>> test-std=# create table t(s int,i interval);
>> CREATE TABLE
>> test-std=# insert into t values (0,'30 days'), (1,'1 month');
>> INSERT 0 2
>> test-std=# se
Em Sex, 2009-04-03 às 15:10 -0400, Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
> Roman Kononov wrote:
>
> > Description:hash join and sort-merge join make different results
> > Details:
> >
> > test-std=# create table t(s int,i interval);
> > CREATE TABLE
> > test-std=# insert into t values (0,'30 days'),
"Dickson S. Guedes" writes:
> I could reproduce this once in a database that already have a table
> named "t", then after i did dropped it i couldn't anymore.
As noted, you might have to force use of a hash join (my machine
preferred a mergejoin before the ANALYZE and a nestloop after).
It's defi
On 2009-04-03 14:57 Tom Lane said the following:
I think we could fix this by having interval_hash() duplicate the
total-span calculation done by interval_cmp_internal, and then return
the hash of the resulting TimeOffset. This is going to break existing
hash indexes on intervals, but there seem
Roman Kononov writes:
> On 2009-04-03 14:57 Tom Lane said the following:
>> I think we could fix this by having interval_hash() duplicate the
>> total-span calculation done by interval_cmp_internal, and then return
>> the hash of the resulting TimeOffset. This is going to break existing
>> hash i
"Roman Kononov" writes:
> Description:hash join and sort-merge join make different results
I've applied a patch for this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00048.php
Thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailin
On 2009-04-03 23:32 Tom Lane said the following:
Roman Kononov writes:
On 2009-04-03 14:57 Tom Lane said the following:
I think we could fix this by having interval_hash() duplicate the
total-span calculation done by interval_cmp_internal, and then return
the hash of the resulting TimeOffset.
Roman Kononov writes:
> On 2009-04-03 23:32 Tom Lane said the following:
>> Uh, what's your point? We have to match interval_eq, not
>> justify_interval.
> For any two intervals a and b, saying that interval_cmp_interval(a,b)==0
> is exactly the same as saying that (aj.month==bj.month && aj.day
23 matches
Mail list logo
