[BUGS] BUG #5209: error in intidb process when installing on japanese machine which is in japanese domain

2009-11-23 Thread Maithili
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5209 Logged by: Maithili Email address: maithili.manur...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.2. Operating system: Windows 2003 Description:error in intidb process when installing on japanese machine which is in jap

[BUGS] BUG #5210: error in intidb process when installing on japanese

2009-11-23 Thread Maithili
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5210 Logged by: Maithili Email address: maithili.manur...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.2 Operating system: Windows 2003 Description:error in intidb process when installing on japanese Details: i try install

Re: [BUGS] Multixact and prepared transactions

2009-11-23 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> We seem to have neglected prepared transactions in the logic that tracks >> the oldest visible multixact. OldestMemberMXactId doesn't contain >> entries for prepared transactions, so the UPDATE incorrectly considers >> the multixact as an old

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5180: How to get only User created tables by using SQLTables() in ODBC

2009-11-23 Thread Nikhil Sontakke
Hi, > Please find the code: > > retValue=SQLTables(hstmt, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, (SQLCHAR*) "TABLE", > SQL_NTS); > You should pass the schemaname to the above call to restrict the result set to a specific schema. For example: SQLTables(hstmt, NULL, 0, (SQLCHAR *)"public"

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5206: wal_sync_method in stock postgresql.conf may be wrong

2009-11-23 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      5206 > Logged by:          Alvaro Herrera > Email address:      alvhe...@postgresql.org > PostgreSQL version: any > Operating system:   any > Description:        wal_sync_me

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5206: wal_sync_method in stock postgresql.conf may be wrong

2009-11-23 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: >> I have two suggestions to fix this: >> >> 1. avoid displaying any value at all as if it were the true default (this >> would perhaps make the line invalid were the user to uncomment it) >> >> 2. change initdb so