[BUGS] BUG #5361: KOI8U issue

2010-03-04 Thread Alexender
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5361 Logged by: Alexender Email address: bav...@mail.ru PostgreSQL version: 8.4 Operating system: Ubuntu server 9.10 (Karmic) Description:KOI8U issue Details: This is real problem. Dump from Postgres 8.2

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5361: KOI8U issue

2010-03-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 07:31 +, Alexender wrote: This is real problem. Dump from Postgres 8.2 can't be restored in Postgres 8.4 if I use on server 8.2 encodings KOI8 and --lc-collate and --lc-ctype uk_UA.KOI8-U Because conversion is not supported between KOI8R and KOI8U and dump 8.2

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On ons, 2010-02-24 at 12:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com writes: Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development machine that make install takes *much* longer, but only sporadically, due to the docs building. This might be related to Peter's

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-04 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On ons, 2010-02-24 at 12:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com writes: Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development machine that make install takes *much* longer, but only

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-04 Thread Lou Picciano
May I add 2 cents? While I'd agree a 'make all' should, uh... make _all_, and that make building based on lots of guessing is counterintuitive, an option to configure like: ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only - with some of the obvious variants - might be very

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5358: Throwing unexpected ERROR

2010-03-04 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com wrote: I just realized that it is the subquery pull-up that is leading

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5358: Throwing unexpected ERROR

2010-03-04 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: Normally this kind of reordering doesn't actually affect the result of the query because normally the quals that are being evaluated don't have any side-effects, but in your query you've chosen something that can throw an exception, so it's