Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: I think that the whole idea of make targets building different things depending on what you've built previously is confusing, counterintuitive, and illogical. make all should either build the docs, or not; trying to guess what the user

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote: While I'd agree a 'make all' should, uh... make _all_, and that make building based on lots of guessing is counterintuitive, an option to configure like: ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only - with some of

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote: ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to have the docs available by default, so they can read them. End

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5348: Postgres crashes with index on xpath_string

2010-03-05 Thread Thomas Kellerer
Thanks for the feedback. Is the problem specific to 8.4.2 or to the Windows platform (or both)? Regards Thomas Bruce Momjian, 27.02.2010 18:42: Yes, we have received a few reports about this and are working on a fix.

[BUGS] BUG #5364: citext behavior when type not in public schema

2010-03-05 Thread Markus Wichitill
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5364 Logged by: Markus Wichitill Email address: ma...@gmx.de PostgreSQL version: 8.4.2 Operating system: Linux, Win7 Description:citext behavior when type not in public schema Details: Comparisons with

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Lou Picciano
Tom's suggestion is much better than mine. I concur fully. My issue, essentially, is that I want to get on with the business of actually testing these alphas... The 'Jade effect' has become an obstacle; time wasted. And, though I do want the documentation - ultimately - I'd like the

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On fre, 2010-03-05 at 08:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote: ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to have the

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote: ./configure --no-docs   or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: By splitting out the doc building into a separate target, we will have less users installing the documentation. I don't see why. And even if it's true, it just means some people were installing the docs by accident before

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5348: Postgres crashes with index on xpath_string

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Thomas Kellerer bestell...@kellerer.name wrote: Thanks for the feedback. Is the problem specific to 8.4.2 or to the Windows platform (or both)? Neither, actually. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to

Re: [BUGS] Bug in triggers

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
2010/3/3 Oleg Serov sero...@gmail.com: I'm asking to fix this =) On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm not sure why that happens.  Is that what you're asking about? Anyone else have an

Re: [BUGS] Bug in triggers

2010-03-05 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm not sure why that happens.  Is that what you're asking about? Anyone else have an opinion on whether this is a

Re: [BUGS] Bug in triggers

2010-03-05 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm not sure why that happens.  Is that what

Re: [BUGS] Bug in triggers

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm not sure why that happens.  Is that what