Hi Guys,
Will you please close the bug if it's not submitted on the right place? This
way I'll not receive this 'useless' discussion... Will certainly think twice
before submitting another bug on postgresql.org!
Thanks!
2010/4/8 Robert Haas
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> It would certainly be nice if we could just have all bugs reported
> here and sort it out ourselves, but in practice that doesn't seem to
> work. When installer or pgadmin bugs are reported here, they
> typically don't get a response. Eventual
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> I can't help thinking that as a community we don't do ourselves any
> favours at all by being so damn pedantic about where bugs should be
> reported. What must new users think when they get chastised for
> reporting a *PostgreSQL* Installer bug, f
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> If this is a real problem for people, perhaps someone should update
> the web form to ask for the sub-project and direct the bug reports
> accordingly rather than have us continue to bleat at users.
> Volunteers?
>
while of course we can answer
I can't help thinking that as a community we don't do ourselves any
favours at all by being so damn pedantic about where bugs should be
reported. What must new users think when they get chastised for
reporting a *PostgreSQL* Installer bug, from an insraller they
probably got via www.postgresql.org
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
>> I accidentally rejected this message while moderating -bugs, so I'm
>> forwarding
>> it to the list to atone for myself. Apologies to all involved...
>>
>> From: Rens Admiraal
>> Date:
2010/3/19 Roberto Rivera Mardones :
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5383
> Logged by: Roberto Rivera Mardones
> Email address: rorive...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.2
> Operating system: Debian 5
> Description: Problemas con GROUP
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> I accidentally rejected this message while moderating -bugs, so I'm forwarding
> it to the list to atone for myself. Apologies to all involved...
>
> From: Rens Admiraal
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:00:27 GMT
> To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
>
manohar cr wrote:
> I am trying to install pgadmin on Suse Linux Enterprise version
> 10.3.
I've never heard of that. I've heard of openSUSE 10.3 and I've
heard of SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) 10 SP3. They're not at
all the same thing. Which do you have?
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 18:08 +0900, manohar cr wrote:
> I am trying to install pgadmin on Suse Linux Enterprise version 10.3.
> It is failing to install.
What is the error message?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.p
Hello..
I am trying to install pgadmin on Suse Linux Enterprise version 10.3.
It is failing to install. I wanted to know, does pgadmin works on SLES
10.3??
Thanks in advance
regards
manohar
"omar" wrote:
> PostgreSQL version: 8.0.0
> Operating system: XP Professional SV2
The earliest version of PostgreSQL supported on Windows is 8.2. You
should be running a recent version of any release -- the 8.0 major
release is up to a 8.0.24 bug patch release, which fixes many
security and
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:13 AM, omar wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5408
> Logged by: omar
> Email address: omarar...@hotmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.0.0
> Operating system: XP Professional SV2
> Description: Failed to conne
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5408
Logged by: omar
Email address: omarar...@hotmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.0
Operating system: XP Professional SV2
Description:Failed to connect to the database
Details:
PostgreSQL 8.0.0 is one of the a
14 matches
Mail list logo
