Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes: >> As in have a (hyptothetical) tracker being subscribed to -bugs (and maybe >> the other lists in the future as well) so the workflow would look like >> this: > > Well there is a WIP to use an ArchiveOpteryX

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5417: intarray adds <@ operator which breaks infromation_schema.referential_constraints

"Kenaniah Cerny" writes: > Attempting to select * from information_schema.referential_constraints when > the intarray contrib module is loaded on a database produces the following > result: >> ERROR: operator is not unique: smallint[] <@ smallint[] >> LINE 1: select $1 <@ $2 and $2 <@ $1 Thanks

Re: [BUGS] bugs that have not been replied-to on list

Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes: > As in have a (hyptothetical) tracker being subscribed to -bugs (and maybe > the other lists in the future as well) so the workflow would look like > this: Well there is a WIP to use an ArchiveOpteryX based solution to replace the archives and get rid of the artifici