On 01/06/10 05:55, Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
Takahiro Itagakiitagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Contib/dblink module seems to have a bug in handling
connection names in NAMEDATALEN-1 bytes.
Here is a patch to fix the bug. I think it comes from wrong usage
of snprintf(NAMEDATALEN - 1). It
megafon=# \d aaa
Table public.aaa
Column | Type | Modifiers
+--+---
num | real |
Yes, really, on smaller quantity of digits of errors is not present.
What type of the data is better for using? Numbers up to 10 and accuracy of
2 fractional signs.
30.05.10, 21:43, Tom Lane
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:24 AM, viras vi...@yandex.ru wrote:
megafon=# \d aaa
Table public.aaa
Column | Type | Modifiers
+--+---
num | real |
Yes, really, on smaller quantity of digits of errors is not present.
What type of the data is better for using? Numbers up to
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have updated the patch, attached, to clarify that this returns text
arrays, and that you can force it to always return one row
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
But actually here's an even simpler workaround, which is IMHO less
ugly than the original one:
SELECT foo, bar, (SELECT regexp_matches(bar, pattern)) FROM table;
Doesn't that blow up if the subselect returns more than one row?
I think you could make
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
But actually here's an even simpler workaround, which is IMHO less
ugly than the original one:
SELECT foo, bar, (SELECT regexp_matches(bar, pattern)) FROM table;
Doesn't that blow up if the subselect returns more than one row?
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I have updated the patch, attached, to clarify that this returns text
arrays, and that you can force it to
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:24 AM, viras vi...@yandex.ru wrote:
What type of the data is better for using? Numbers up to 10
and accuracy of 2 fractional signs.
numeric is a good choice to avoid loss of precision, but can be a
bit slower.
You
