Awesome
Thanks for the help
Marcel Asio
Network & System Administrator
Redbet Technology
Mobile: +46 (0)709 13 04 01
Work: +46 (0)8 12 09 99 41
marcel.a...@redbet.com
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e
Saneesh Apte wrote:
I think I found two bugs (and I hope I am not wasting everyone's time).
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT
instead or java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be
aliases for the same type?
Types.BOOLEAN does not exis
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes:
> > Yes, I'd say that documentation is the answer, given. Hmmm are
> > double-quotes respected in postgresql.conf, though? Need testing.
>
> Not sure. Something like
>
> local_preload_libraries = '"Foo", "Bar"'
>
> will definitely work. Don't
"Baegle" writes:
> The default cost of crypt() is 1, but crypt is intentionally a high cost
> function. This mis-match between assigned cost and actual cost causes the
> query planner to use crypt too soon and slows down execution of queries
> significantly. The cost of the function should be more
Marcel Asio writes:
> I was suspecting that it was incompatibility that hadn't been documented
> correctly, just wanted to make sure that this was the case.
> It probably should go into the release notes too since it is bound to affect
> others
Yeah, done.
regards, t
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5530
Logged by: Baegle
Email address: a...@wifiny.org
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4
Operating system: Linux - Ubuntu - Lucid Lynx - 2.6.31-19-generic
Description:Default cost of crypt causes poor decisions
Details:
Hi,
I think I found two bugs (and I hope I am not wasting everyone's
time).
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT
instead or java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these
be aliases for the same type?
And secondly the returned type from a s
I was suspecting that it was incompatibility that hadn't been documented
correctly, just wanted to make sure that this was the case.
It probably should go into the release notes too since it is bound to affect
others
Thankfully
Marcel Asio
Network & System Administrator
Redbet Technology
Mobi
Marcel Asio writes:
> Yes I managed to figured that out, but when was this changed?
> It was working in 8.4 but not 9.0 and I could not find anything about this in
> the release notes.
The 9.0 release notes are not really up to snuff yet :-(. The only
thing in the notes about it is "Allow PL/
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Saneesh Apte wrote:
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT
instead or java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be
aliases for the same type?
These are aliases for the same type. I believe we accept either BOOLEAN
or BIT as
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Peter Mengaziol
wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5520
> Logged by: Peter Mengaziol
> Email address: pmengaz...@electrainfo.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4
> Operating system: OS X 10.4.13
> Description:
Hi Tom,
Yes I managed to figured that out, but when was this changed?
It was working in 8.4 but not 9.0 and I could not find anything about this in
the release notes.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 17:32 , Tom Lane wrote:
> Marcel Asio writes:
>> I've started testing our applications against PostgreSQ
Marcel Asio writes:
> I've started testing our applications against PostgreSQL 9.0 beta2 and found
> that this function now does not work anymore(rewritten to be as small and
> anonymous as possible)
> CREATE TYPE test_type AS(
> product text,
> amount numeric(30,4)
> );
> CREATE FUNCTION
Saneesh Apte wrote:
> the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT instead or
> java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be
> aliases for the same type?
>
> And secondly the returned type from a smallint[] is an Integer[]
> instead of a Short[].
Should the objects in
Hi
I've started testing our applications against PostgreSQL 9.0 beta2 and found
that this function now does not work anymore(rewritten to be as small and
anonymous as possible)
CREATE TYPE test_type AS(
product text,
amount numeric(30,4)
);
CREATE FUNCTION test_func() RETURNS SETOF test_ty
Hi,
I think I found two bugs (and I hope I am not wasting everyone's time).
One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT instead or
java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be aliases for
the same type?
And secondly the returned type from a smal
16 matches
Mail list logo
