The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5573
Logged by: Vimi
Email address: vimmip...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: Ver 8.4.1
Operating system: Windows 7
Description:How can i add field inbetween in the table while
creating
Details:
If i have
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:34:56AM +, Vimi wrote:
If i have already crreated one table and i wan to add one more field into
table but its ibetween imean if i have 4 fields are already created and if i
want to add one more field aat 2nd index then how can i do in postgre. i
tried in Navicat
Vimi vimmip...@gmail.com wrote:
How can i add field inbetween in the table while creating
This is not a bug; in the future please post such questions to
pgsql-general.
While the feature you're requesting is likely to appear in a future
release, current releases require that you create a new
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5574
Logged by: Valentine Gogichashvili
Email address: val...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0beta3
Operating system: RedHat Linux (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)
Description:PANIC on hot-standby: heap_update_redo
Details:
Excerpts from Kenichiro Tanaka's message of dom jul 25 21:01:01 -0400 2010:
This is a bug report.
When I tested in PostgreSQL9 beta3,I got an error.
==
select * from part_bug where HIRENUM=4 for update;
failed to fetch tuple for EvalPlanQual
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:13:56PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Kenichiro Tanaka's message of dom jul 25 21:01:01 -0400 2010:
This is a bug report.
When I tested in PostgreSQL9 beta3,I got an error.
==
select * from part_bug
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from depstein's message of lun jul 26 08:05:24 -0400 2010:
I just want to note that one reason regclass may be used in user tables (as
opposed to, say, regtype) is that in PL/pgSQL trigger procedures there is a
special variable
Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of mar jul 27 17:20:37 -0400 2010:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:13:56PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Kenichiro Tanaka's message of dom jul 25 21:01:01 -0400 2010:
This is a bug report.
When I tested in PostgreSQL9 beta3,I got an error.
Valentine Gogichashvili val...@gmail.com writes:
A hot-standby machine was recieving WAL files for 2 days now (omnipitr
scripts), and then it crashed with the following error:
2010-07-27 15:26:09.759 CEST,,,22151,,4c49acba.5687,5697,,2010-07-23
16:52:42
On Jul 27, 5:02 pm, val...@gmail.com (Valentine Gogichashvili)
wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5574
Logged by: Valentine Gogichashvili
Email address: val...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0beta3
Operating system: RedHat Linux
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of mar jul 27 17:20:37 -0400 2010:
I guess youve compiled with --enable-cassert and Kenchiro-san has not?
Eh, of course. I'm just pointing out that this is a serious bug :-)
I spent some time looking at
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Ranga Gopalan ranga_gopa...@hotmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5543
Logged by: Ranga Gopalan
Email address: ranga_gopa...@hotmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4
Operating system: Linux x86-64
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Does it help if you put a CHECK (false) constraint on the parent table?
It won't --- it'll still result in an append plan even if there's only
one surviving child.
This is one of many things that seem to me to not make sense to tackle
until we have an
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Does it help if you put a CHECK (false) constraint on the parent table?
It won't --- it'll still result in an append plan even if there's only
one surviving child.
This is one of
14 matches
Mail list logo
