The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6063
Logged by: Praveen
Email address: spkumarvay...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4
Operating system: windows 7
Description:compatability issues
Details:
our application run on following platform
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6064
Logged by: Michael Pilling
Email address: michael.pill...@dsto.defence.gov.au
PostgreSQL version: PostgreSQL 9.0
Operating system: Windows XP (server) Ubuntu 10.4 (Client)
Description:!= NULL, NULL do not
Do not write expression = NULL because NULL is not equal to NULL. (The
null value represents an unknown value, and it is not known whether two
unknown values are equal.) This behavior conforms to the SQL standard.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/functions-comparison.html
On Fri, Jun
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6066
Logged by: Christoph Berg
Email address: c...@df7cb.de
PostgreSQL version: 9.1, 9.0, 8.4
Operating system: any
Description:Bad string in German translation causes segfault
(user-triggerable)
Details:
In
--On 17. Juni 2011 08:18:03 + Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
In German locale, the follow statement causes vsnprintf() to segfault when
printing the hint:
SELECT TO_DATE('30.12.2011', 'MMDD') AS datum;
Fix tested for 8.4:
Additionally, this seems to be the case for 9.0, 9.1
On 17.06.2011 11:22, Bernd Helmle wrote:
--On 17. Juni 2011 08:18:03 + Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de wrote:
In German locale, the follow statement causes vsnprintf() to segfault
when
printing the hint:
SELECT TO_DATE('30.12.2011', 'MMDD') AS datum;
Fix tested for 8.4:
Additionally,
Re: Heikki Linnakangas 2011-06-17 4dfb137e.4040...@enterprisedb.com
So, this is a case where the untranslated string doesn't have a %s
in it, but the translated one does. We should have a way to check
those automatically. In fact, I'm surprised if someone somewhere
hasn't already written such
Hi,
I'm not sure that this is not a configuration or networking issue (so
apologies if it is), but we seem to be getting rare (a few times/day)
failures with ident authentication because several clients attempt to do
it simultaneously over a high-latency connection (capitalized = edited
Re: To pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org 2011-06-17
20110617091114.gc4...@msgid.df7cb.de
Unfortunately that doesn't help in this case, as the bad string isn't
tagged as #, c-format, but still gets used as such. This seems to be
the case for many errhint() strings. Maybe xgettext should be taught
to
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6065
Logged by: Ben
Email address: bwtes...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4
Operating system: üLinux version 2.6.21-uc0 on ARM processor
(NXP-LPC2478)
Description:FATAL: lock 0 not held
Details:
while
17.06.2011, 00:28, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov:
* **zlobnyni...@yandex.ru; wrote:
[4-1] 2011-06-16 17:40:27 UTC LOG: startup process (PID 15292)
was terminated by signal 7: Bus error
Signal 7 means hardware problems. But all 10 replicas crashed
within 10
Michael Pilling michael.pill...@dsto.defence.gov.au wrote:
A reasonable programmer would expect != NULL, NULL and IS NOT
NULL to be synonyms.
Only if that programmer was not aware of the SQL standard and had
not worked much with a standard-conforming database.
NULL is conceptually
Excerpts from Christoph Berg's message of vie jun 17 07:10:34 -0400 2011:
Re: To pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org 2011-06-17
20110617091114.gc4...@msgid.df7cb.de
Unfortunately that doesn't help in this case, as the bad string isn't
tagged as #, c-format, but still gets used as such. This seems to
Ben bwtes...@yahoo.com writes:
Operating system: üLinux version 2.6.21-uc0 on ARM processor
(NXP-LPC2478)
Description:FATAL: lock 0 not held
Details:
while initialising with initdb, after creating and filling new WAL file.
We see LWLockAcquire(11) followed by LWLockRelease(0)
Marinos Yannikos m...@geizhals.at writes:
I'm not sure that this is not a configuration or networking issue (so
apologies if it is), but we seem to be getting rare (a few times/day)
failures with ident authentication because several clients attempt to do
it simultaneously over a
* **zlobnyni...@yandex.ru wrote:
17.06.2011, 00:28, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov:
* **zlobnyni...@yandex.ru; wrote:
[4-1] 2011-06-16 17:40:27 UTC LOG: startup process (PID 15292)
was terminated by signal 7: Bus error
Signal 7 means hardware
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
I still do not believe that this is hardware problem.
How would an application cause a bus error?
unaligned memory access on risc maybe? what's this running on?
merlin
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list
17.06.2011, 20:19, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov; wrote:
I still do not believe that this is hardware problem.
How would an application cause a bus error?
unaligned memory access on risc maybe? what's
2011/6/17 Антон Степаненко zlobnyni...@yandex.ru:
17.06.2011, 20:19, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov; wrote:
I still do not believe that this is hardware problem.
How would an application cause a bus error?
I wrote:
I don't think it's a race condition per se. The code ought to be
setting up the address argument for bind() with sin_port = 0 so that
an unused port number gets assigned. That seems to be what happens on
a couple of machines that I tried here, but I notice that the Linux
manpage
2011/6/16 Luiz K. Matsumura l...@planit.com.br:
Em 16/06/2011 16:39, Robert Haas escreveu:
2011/6/10 Luiz K. Matsumura l...@planit.com.br:
I need help to know if the follow scenario is a expected behaviour, a bug of
postgres or a bug of slony:
Postgres v8.4.8
Slony-I v 2.0.5
I have
17.06.2011, 21:24, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
2011/6/17 Антон Степаненко zlobnyni...@yandex.ru;:
17.06.2011, 20:19, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com;:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov;; wrote:
I still do not believe that this is
2011/6/17 Антон Степаненко zlobnyni...@yandex.ru:
17.06.2011, 21:24, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
2011/6/17 Антон Степаненко zlobnyni...@yandex.ru;:
17.06.2011, 20:19, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com;:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov;;
I wonder if you are oversubscribing your memory, and are getting weird
errors when reading data into memory because the pages can't be
reserved to do that. What happens when you enable overcommit and
attempt to start the server?
merlin
In my first post I wrote: I tried to set
2011/6/17 Антон Степаненко zlobnyni...@yandex.ru:
I wonder if you are oversubscribing your memory, and are getting weird
errors when reading data into memory because the pages can't be
reserved to do that. What happens when you enable overcommit and
attempt to start the server?
merlin
In
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:51:59 +0200, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I looked at the glibc source code for getaddrinfo, and it looks like
they do reliably set sin_port to zero when no service argument is
provided, despite the above documentation statement. So that's why it
works for me. But
bOn 06/17/2011 04:47 PM, Антон Степаненко wrote:
Memory for shared buffers can not be ovesubscribed - because if kernel
did not provide enough shared memory postgres will not start.
The block is allocated at once. But the amount of it that various
client backends end up touching varies as
27 matches
Mail list logo
