Re: [BUGS] BUG #7781: pgagent incorrect installation

2013-01-07 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Aleksander Shniperson alex.shniper...@gmail.com wrote: There is no install-pgagent.log file. Anyway i try to sudo find no result. 07.01.2013, в 9:19, Sandeep Thakkar написал(а): The ini file clearly says that the pgAgent has been installed in

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7792: pg_dump does not treat -c flag correctly when using tar format

2013-01-07 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: emes...@redhat.com writes: 1) pg_dump -F t -U postgres -f test.tar test 2) tar xvf test.tar to any directory 3) vi restore.sql * restore.sql includes DROP statements for each object even tough -c flag was not given I

[BUGS] BUG #7798: Query in a rule does not see committed transaction

2013-01-07 Thread lars
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 7798 Logged by: Lars Kanis Email address: l...@greiz-reinsdorf.de PostgreSQL version: 9.1.7 Operating system: Linux - Ubuntu 12.04 Description: Everything in isolation level read committed. Database

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7792: pg_dump does not treat -c flag correctly when using tar format

2013-01-07 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: emes...@redhat.com writes: * restore.sql includes DROP statements for each object even tough -c flag was not given I believe this is intentional - at least, pg_backup_tar.c goes out

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7792: pg_dump does not treat -c flag correctly when using tar format

2013-01-07 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: emes...@redhat.com writes: * restore.sql includes DROP statements for each object even tough -c flag was not given

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7781: pgagent incorrect installation

2013-01-07 Thread Aleksander Shniperson
There is no install-pgagent.log file. Anyway i try to sudo find no result. 07.01.2013, в 9:19, Sandeep Thakkar написал(а): The ini file clearly says that the pgAgent has been installed in /Library/pgAgent. Can you please share install-pgagent.log from your system temp (/tmp)? On Sat, Jan

[BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread afonit
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 7797 Logged by: Jared Thompson Email address: afo...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.2.2 Operating system: Ubuntu 12.04 Description: This query: select '2012-01-31'::date + '1 month'::interval

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7781: pgagent incorrect installation

2013-01-07 Thread Aleksander Shniperson
Looks like worked, thanks! have a nice day. 07.01.2013, в 13:43, Dave Page написал(а): On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Aleksander Shniperson alex.shniper...@gmail.com wrote: There is no install-pgagent.log file. Anyway i try to sudo find no result. 07.01.2013, в 9:19, Sandeep Thakkar

[BUGS] BUG #7796: LC_MESSAGES

2013-01-07 Thread funnybonn40
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 7796 Logged by: Michael Email address: funnybon...@yahoo.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.7 Operating system: Windows 7 Description: Hello, my engish is not so good, but i try to describe what seems not to

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread Ryan Kelly
On Mon, Jan 01/07/13, 2013 at 02:29:43PM +, afo...@gmail.com wrote: The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 7797 Logged by: Jared Thompson Email address: afo...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.2.2 Operating system: Ubuntu 12.04

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread Daniele Varrazzo
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ryan Kelly rpkell...@gmail.com wrote: '1 month'::interval is the same as '30 days'::interval. No, it's not. # select '2012-07-31'::date + '1 month'::interval, '2012-07-31'::date + '30 days'::interval; ?column? | ?column?

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread Ryan Kelly
On Mon, Jan 01/07/13, 2013 at 05:42:40PM +, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ryan Kelly rpkell...@gmail.com wrote: '1 month'::interval is the same as '30 days'::interval. No, it's not. # select '2012-07-31'::date + '1 month'::interval, '2012-07-31'::date +

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread Daniele Varrazzo
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Ryan Kelly rpkell...@gmail.com wrote: Alright, now I'm thoroughly confused. What magic makes this true: Internally interval values are stored as months, days, and seconds. This is done because the number of days in a month varies, and a day can have 23 or 25

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread Tam Tran
On 1/7/2013 9:47 AM, Ryan Kelly wrote: On Mon, Jan 01/07/13, 2013 at 05:42:40PM +, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ryan Kelly rpkell...@gmail.com wrote: '1 month'::interval is the same as '30 days'::interval. No, it's not. # select '2012-07-31'::date + '1

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread Tom Lane
afo...@gmail.com writes: This query: select '2012-01-31'::date + '1 month'::interval Produces this result: 2012-02-29 00:00:00 2012-02-29 is not a valid date. February only goes to 28 days. Uh, 2012 was a leap year, and so 2012-02-29 is a perfectly valid date. I am not sure what the

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread Tom Lane
Ryan Kelly rpkell...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Jan 01/07/13, 2013 at 05:42:40PM +, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ryan Kelly rpkell...@gmail.com wrote: '1 month'::interval is the same as '30 days'::interval. No, it's not. Alright, now I'm thoroughly confused.

[BUGS] wrong search_path being used

2013-01-07 Thread Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
I didn't want to report the bug using the form before confirming it here. Here is a gist of what I'm trying: https://gist.github.com/49fcc8c4a5a810f66833#file-cleanup-sql The relevant part being this: old_path := pg_catalog.current_setting('search_path'); raise notice 'setting search_path

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7797: datetime + '1 month'::interval is going outside of a month's bounds

2013-01-07 Thread jared
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Ryan Kelly rpkell...@gmail.com wrote: February has 29 days in 2012. Thanks I realize now I was looking at 2013's calendar while typing in 2012 '1 month'::interval is the same as '30 days'::interval. -Ryan Kelly Thank you.

Re: [BUGS] wrong search_path being used

2013-01-07 Thread Tom Lane
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas rr.ro...@gmail.com writes: perform pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', templ, true); ... select count(distinct transaction_id) from public.transaction_condition into temp_count; raise notice '% remaining transactions in public!', temp_count; select

Re: [BUGS] wrong search_path being used

2013-01-07 Thread Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
Em 07-01-2013 17:17, Tom Lane escreveu: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosasrr.ro...@gmail.com writes: perform pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', templ, true); ... select count(distinct transaction_id) from public.transaction_condition into temp_count; raise notice '% remaining transactions in

[BUGS] BUG #7799: Several configuration options in guc.c miss descriptions

2013-01-07 Thread tixu
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 7799 Logged by: Tianyin Xu Email address: t...@cs.ucsd.edu PostgreSQL version: 9.2.2 Operating system: any Description: Hi, I just noticed that several developer options do not have descriptions (in