On 2013-08-02 22:25:36 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund escribió:
> > On 2013-08-02 18:17:43 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> > >
> > > > As it turns out, I have a patched slru.c that adds a new function to
> > > > verify whether a page exists on disk. I c
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:20:37PM -0400, Jesse Denardo wrote:
> Alvaro,
>
> I applied the patch and tried upgrading again, and everything seemed to work
> as
> expected. We are now up and running the beta!
Yeah, great, thanks everyone!
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
Enterpris
Alvaro,
I applied the patch and tried upgrading again, and everything seemed to
work as expected. We are now up and running the beta!
--
Jesse Denardo
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund escribió:
> > On 2013-08-02 18:17:43 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > >
Andres Freund escribió:
> On 2013-08-02 18:17:43 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> >
> > > As it turns out, I have a patched slru.c that adds a new function to
> > > verify whether a page exists on disk. I created this for the commit
> > > timestamp module, for the BDR b
On 2013-08-02 18:17:43 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera escribió:
>
> > As it turns out, I have a patched slru.c that adds a new function to
> > verify whether a page exists on disk. I created this for the commit
> > timestamp module, for the BDR branch, but I think it's what we need
Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> As it turns out, I have a patched slru.c that adds a new function to
> verify whether a page exists on disk. I created this for the commit
> timestamp module, for the BDR branch, but I think it's what we need
> here.
Here's a patch that should fix the problem. Jesse,
I wrote:
> ... further experimentation says that this doesn't work on my ancient
> HPUX box; and you're complaining about Windows. So what we've got here
> is a platform dependency in the behavior of strtod(). I don't think
> we can promise to hide all such dependencies, but maybe it'd be a good
gr...@yandex.ru writes:
> PL/Python can't convert Python's float with infinity value to PostgreSQL's
> float.
> The reason is that Python's standard representation of infinity is 'inf'
> ('Infinity' is accepted as well), but PostgreSQL's representation is
> 'Infinity' only.
Hmm, I was about to con
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 8355
Logged by: Basil Peace
Email address: gr...@yandex.ru
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.4
Operating system: Windows 7 x64 (PostgreSQL is x86), Python 3.2.5
Description:
PL/Python can't convert Python's float
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 8354
Logged by: Alex Hill
Email address: a...@hill.net.au
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.4
Operating system: OS X 10.8.4 Mountain Lion
Description:
Hi all,
The docs for ts_rank_cd state:
"This function requ
On 08/02/2013 01:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:07:54PM +, jaroslav.pota...@gmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 8293
Logged by: Yaroslav Potapov
Email address: jaroslav.pota...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL ver
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:07:54PM +, jaroslav.pota...@gmail.com wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 8293
> Logged by: Yaroslav Potapov
> Email address: jaroslav.pota...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: Unsupported/Unknown
> Operating
"vijayakumar.su...@hp.com" wrote:
> We are facing issue when trying to start postgresql on the Debian
> machine.
This is almost certainly not a bug; so it doesn't belong on this
list. pgsql-general would probably have been the best choice.
Please pick a more appropriate list for any future que
No, it's super frustrating. While I do the recovery, it says it reaches a
consistent recovery state, and i just cannot find a way how to convince pg
to stop at that state:
2013-08-02 09:23:25 GMT DEBUG: postgres: PostmasterMain: initial
environment dump:
2013-08-02 09:23:25 GMT DEBUG:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Klaus Ita wrote:
> Isn't it a funny coincidence, that we also had a corruption of that
> same/similar type?
>
> my disk was quite confidently not tampered. I am wondering: Does PG sign, or
> checksum wal_files? Is the integrity of wal_files ensured by any mechanism
Isn't it a funny coincidence, that we also had a corruption of that
same/similar type?
my disk was quite confidently not tampered. I am wondering: Does PG sign,
or checksum wal_files? Is the integrity of wal_files ensured by any
mechanism? Because if it IS, then - in our case - it's a corruption c
On 08/02/2013 01:48 AM, dy...@rbauction.com wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 8352
> Logged by: Daisy
> Email address: dy...@rbauction.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.4
> Operating system: Windows 7
> Description:
>
> When joini
17 matches
Mail list logo
