Bugfix patches in the next CF, was: Re: [BUGS] pg_ctl -D /absolute/path -m fast restart - doesn't work in some cases

2013-05-17 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2013-05-16 23:55 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta: Josh Kupershmidt escribió: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:34 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski dep...@depesz.com wrote: only when Pg is started with relative path, and restarted with absolute, the problem shows. It has been a nuisance for me too.

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus

2012-04-15 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2012-04-14 18:15 keltezéssel, Peter Eisentraut írta: On lör, 2012-04-14 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: It has a lot of sense. Without it, it's very difficult to do logical replication on a table with no primary

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6461: -t deletes primary key

2012-02-19 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2012-02-19 09:30 keltezéssel, Peter Eisentraut írta: On fre, 2012-02-17 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: lenka.piy...@gmail.com writes: when i restore a particular table using pg_restore (using option -t) it doesn't restore my primary key... This is not a bug. -t selects the table only, not

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6315: FETCH NEXT :next ROWS ONLY fails

2011-12-01 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2011-12-01 20:09 keltezéssel, rep.dot@gmail.com írta: The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6315 Logged by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Email address: rep.dot@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.1 Operating system: linux Description:

Re: [BUGS] char(0)

2011-10-17 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2011-10-17 14:28 keltezéssel, Susanne Ebrecht írta: On 17.10.2011 10:30, Simon Riggs wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Susanne Ebrecht susa...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: PostgreSQL isn't supporting CHAR(0). What does the SQL Standard say? Document: 02-Foundation Section: 4.2.1

Re: [BUGS] Cache lookup failure for index during pg_dump

2010-05-27 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Tom Lane írta: Bob Lunney bob_lun...@yahoo.com writes: I have a job that summarizes some data from a table, truncates the table, drops the indexes, writes the summarized data back into the table, then recreates the indexes. The operations above are not in a single transaction, but

Re: [BUGS] dividing money by money

2010-03-30 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Kevin Grittner írta: Andy Balholm wrote: The ability to divide money by money would be useful for finding what percent one money value is of another. That certainly sounds useful and natural to me. I don't think it rises to the level of a *bug*, but it's a reasonable request

Re: [BUGS] dividing money by money

2010-03-30 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
John R Pierce írta: Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: Loading this dump into another database that happens to have a different locale than hu_HU fails. But then any operator between two money values would only work if both values have the same currency. indeed, its all a big tarpit. next