On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Anyone have an idea on this one?
>
> > It is maybe not bug, but I didn't find any warning about this behavior.
> >
> > select current_date + 1; -- ok
> > select 1 + current_date; -- not
> >
> > ERROR: operator does not exist: integer + date
> > HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You may
> > need to add explicit typecasts.
It's not a bug. The operator + has one definition of the type
(date,integer) -> date
but there is no definition for
(integer,date) -> date
Instead of integer one can also have an interval. So if you start with a
date you can add an interval to it. But if you start with a time interval
you can not add a date to it. What would it mean to add a date to
something? I have no idea. Well, that's the logic behind the current
behaviour.
It would of course not be difficult to add a definition of + with the
integer first and the date as the second argument. To me it's not much of
an improvement, but it's not for me to decide. The postgresql operator +
is not the same as the mathematical operator + and it does not have the
same properties.
--
/Dennis
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
