Re: [BUGS] Postgres crash? could not write to log file: No space left on device

2013-06-25 Thread Jeff Davis
that, or write() wrote less than expected but did not set errno. It looks like we assume ENOSPC when errno is not set. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] general question and BUG #5038

2013-04-17 Thread Jeff Davis
, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Issue with range types and casts?

2013-03-29 Thread Jeff Davis
exactly, though. Regards, Jeff Davis [1] To make it more plausible, tstzrange2 might have a canonicalization function that turns it into a discrete range (kind of like date but at a resolution smaller than a day). -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make

Re: [BUGS] Arbitrary whitespace restrictions on range types

2012-12-18 Thread Jeff Davis
, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Bug with temporary child of a permanent table after recovery

2012-12-17 Thread Jeff Davis
a hold on a non-local temp table? Or do you just mean as a sanity check? Either way, blocking it at the top sounds good to me. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref

Re: [BUGS] Bug with temporary child of a permanent table after recovery

2012-12-14 Thread Jeff Davis
RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP(relation) \ ((relation)-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP \ !isTempOrToastNamespace((relation)-rd_rel-relnamespace)) (I haven't analyzed the above code very carefully; it's just for illustration purposes). Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] init_htab causes SIGFPE (or worse) due to miscalculation for large nbuckets

2012-12-10 Thread Jeff Davis
, because the caller would see that it returns a long (and compiler, but I don't seem to get a warning for implicit long-int conversions). Both of the callers that actually want a log2 already assume that the input is a power of two, so we can redefine my_log2 to require it. Regards, Jeff

Re: [BUGS] init_htab causes SIGFPE (or worse) due to miscalculation for large nbuckets

2012-12-10 Thread Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 20:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes: It looks like all of the callers, except two, immediately shift the result. So perhaps it would be better to make a new function (something like ceil_pow2) that returns the lowest power of two greater

Re: [BUGS] init_htab causes SIGFPE (or worse) due to miscalculation for large nbuckets

2012-12-10 Thread Jeff Davis
think of a reason for something outside to call them. Regards, Jeff Davis [1]: The test case will just eat a lot of memory right now, but that's only because I set work_mem so high. So, it doesn't actually complete, but it no longer corrupts the HASHHDR. htab.patch.gz Description: GNU

[BUGS] init_htab causes SIGFPE (or worse) due to miscalculation for large nbuckets

2012-12-09 Thread Jeff Davis
. In practice, work_mem will usually be the limiting factor anyway, but not if it's set high. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7716: Only owner can drop trigger?

2012-11-30 Thread Jeff Davis
dropping a trigger created by someone else. I agree that it's inconsistent. I'm not sure why they added the separate TRIGGER privilege in the first place, but it was done more than 10 years ago. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7716: Only owner can drop trigger?

2012-11-30 Thread Jeff Davis
privilege) is to track the owner of the trigger separately from the owner of the table, but that would be strange, too. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7651: Superfluous calls to functions used for indexing

2012-11-15 Thread Jeff Davis
on an IMMUTABLE function to be called a specific number of times. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7648: Momentary index corruption while in hot standby

2012-11-09 Thread Jeff Davis
presume. This is reading from a 9.0.8 Postgres. Any indication whether it's present on other versions or does it appear to be isolated to 9.0.X? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [BUGS] BUG #7525: Deferred unique index with predicate

2012-10-20 Thread Jeff Davis
: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-createtable.html#SQL-CREATETABLE-EXCLUDE To make it equivalent to UNIQUE, set all operators to =, e.g.: CREATE TABLE xyz(i int, exclude (i WITH =) where (i 10) deferrable); Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql

Re: [BUGS] Re: Probable bug with CreateFakeRelcacheEntry (now with reproducible test case)

2012-09-13 Thread Jeff Davis
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 12:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote: This bug seems particularly troublesome because the right fix would be to include the relpersistence in the WAL records that need it. But that can't be backported

[BUGS] Re: Probable bug with CreateFakeRelcacheEntry (now with reproducible test case)

2012-09-12 Thread Jeff Davis
was hiding this one. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] Probable bug with CreateFakeRelcacheEntry

2012-09-10 Thread Jeff Davis
of the consequences is that you can get buffers with the wrong flags set; in particular, missing BM_PERMANENT, which seems like it could be a serious problem. Are there other areas where we might have similar problems? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] event triggers patch breaks with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS

2012-07-23 Thread Jeff Davis
to hash_create(), and no hash_destroy() is called. Unless I'm missing something, that's a leak in TopMemoryContext. Regards, Jeff Davis #0 0x004683a2 in extractRelOptions (tuple=0x11cd528, tupdesc=0x7fc9e499b420, amoptions=0) at reloptions.c:778 #1 0x008513f8

Re: [BUGS] Meeting schedule

2012-07-03 Thread Jeff Davis
support, it is available from these companies: http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/ Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6669: unique index w/ multiple columns and NULLs

2012-06-04 Thread Jeff Davis
://thoughts.davisjeff.com/2009/08/02/what-is-the-deal-with-nulls/ Jose was not wrong about the inconsistency between UNIQUE and GROUP BY. But the answer is that we do it that way because the standard says so. And that's a good reason. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] check_locale() and the empty string

2012-03-25 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 19:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes: Surely we don't want it to be set from the environment, right? Why not? I agree that we shouldn't change the documented behavior of those GUCs. But a SQL command like CREATE DATABASE being environment

[BUGS] possible bug in COPY ... FROM ... NULL '\0'

2012-03-25 Thread Jeff Davis
the null string without modification into the output file. COPY FROM seems to de-escape the input before trying to match it against the null string, leading to the invalid byte sequence. standard_conforming_strings is on. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql

Re: [BUGS] check_locale() and the empty string

2012-03-12 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 11:20 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: The problem seems to be in check_locale(), which just checks for a non-NULL return value from setlocale(). However, the manual for setlocale() says: If locale is , each part of the locale that should be modified is set according

[BUGS] check_locale() and the empty string

2012-03-11 Thread Jeff Davis
the environment, right? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs

2011-12-05 Thread Jeff Davis
operation.  When you execute the query, it displays the date constant using the now-current datestyle. Another thought: why does it execute the type input function (which is dependent on a GUC), but not the cast? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org

[BUGS] possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs

2011-11-30 Thread Jeff Davis
results is correct? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] possible bug seen with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS and changing GUCs

2011-11-30 Thread Jeff Davis
as to which result is more correct, but I doubt we're going to try to do something about that. Best advice is to avoid ambiguous input, or if you can't, at least avoid flipping your datestyle on the fly. I'm fine calling that not a bug, though it appears to work in 8.3. Regards, Jeff Davis

Re: [BUGS] Window function bug

2011-07-12 Thread Jeff Davis
pretty useless, so I'm thinking it's not worth back-patching a fix for. Comments? Agreed. I'm not worried about backpatching it. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref

[BUGS] Window function bug

2011-07-11 Thread Jeff Davis
In branch postgresql/master: SELECT SUM(SUM(a)) OVER () FROM (SELECT NULL::int4 AS a WHERE FALSE) R; ERROR: XX000: cannot extract attribute from empty tuple slot Honestly, I'm not sure what the semantics of that are supposed to be. Is it even allowed by the standard? Regards, Jeff

Re: [BUGS] Re: PG regression with row comparison when btree_gist is enabled (BUG)

2011-07-06 Thread Jeff Davis
, and I don't think we have a lot of test coverage in this area (and I didn't see an easy way to add many tests), so this will need some review. Regards, Jeff Davis rowcmp2.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make

Re: [BUGS] Re: PG regression with row comparison when btree_gist is enabled (BUG)

2011-07-06 Thread Jeff Davis
it can return amoplefttype and amoprighttype too, but given the small number of callers, an API change for it doesn't seem like a problem. Sounds good to me. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [BUGS] Re: PG regression with row comparison when btree_gist is enabled (BUG)

2011-07-05 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 18:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes: On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 13:20 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: Interesting problem... the bug is in get_op_btree_interpretation() which has code like this: ... However, that's a bogus test, because btree_gist

Re: [BUGS] Re: PG regression with row comparison when btree_gist is enabled (BUG)

2011-07-02 Thread Jeff Davis
. The alternatives don't seem very attractive. To get it to work with one lookup we'd have to either clutter the btree opclasses with , or invent a new syscache that has the AM as a key so we can filter out non-btree opclasses. I suppose this is another argument for type interfaces. Regards, Jeff Davis

[BUGS] Did this report get lost?

2011-06-26 Thread Jeff Davis
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-06/msg00167.php Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6064: != NULL, NULL do not work [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-06-20 Thread Jeff Davis
in the documentation that could be improved, but warnings on every page would be counterproductive. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] Re: PG regression with row comparison when btree_gist is enabled (BUG)

2011-06-19 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 13:20 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: Interesting problem... the bug is in get_op_btree_interpretation() which has code like this: /* * If we can't find any opfamily

[BUGS] possible bug: orphaned files left after immediate shutdown during DDL

2011-02-09 Thread Jeff Davis
be removed at recovery time is challenging? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] inheritance_planner() bug in 9.1

2011-01-12 Thread Jeff Davis
-paramlist, and uses it in subsequent iterations; but that isn't copied before the context is reset. It looks like there are other things that need copying as well, but it wasn't immediately clear to me what the best fix is. Regards, Jeff Davis begin; create table parent1( a int); create table

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5809: bigserial duplicate value

2011-01-03 Thread Jeff Davis
have been recreated somehow. Try to provide more detail in your bug report. See: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_problems Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org

Re: [BUGS] Recovery bug

2010-11-11 Thread Jeff Davis
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 18:20 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 11.11.2010 02:20, Jeff Davis wrote: There is a problem with this patch. ReadRecord() not only modifies global variables, it also modifies the location pointed to by record, which is later used to set wasShutdown. How about

Re: [BUGS] Recovery bug

2010-11-10 Thread Jeff Davis
serious issue to me (backups could appear unrecoverable), so please consider this before the next patch-level release so that the bad fix doesn't go out to the world. Also, you might want to double-check that there aren't other side effects that we're still missing. Regards, Jeff Davis

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5732: parsing of: WHERE mycol=123AND ...

2010-10-28 Thread Jeff Davis
. I don't really see a bug here. Is this causing you some kind of problem? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Recovery bug

2010-10-25 Thread Jeff Davis
yet, but it looks like some of the following code depends on ReadRecord(NULL,...) fetching the record right after the checkpoint record; so I think something else is required if you want to use ReadRecord. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5722: vacuum full does not update last_vacuum statistics

2010-10-25 Thread Jeff Davis
). Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Recovery bug

2010-10-19 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 09:51 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 12:26 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Excluding pg_xlog is just a recommendation at the moment, though, so we would need a big warning in the docs. And some way to enforce that just_kidding is not included

Re: [BUGS] Recovery bug

2010-10-18 Thread Jeff Davis
your proposed patch (i.e., check whether REDO location exists). Either is fine with me. Do users have any expectation that they can restore a backup without using recovery.conf by merely having the WAL segments in pg_xlog? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list

Re: [BUGS] Recovery bug

2010-10-18 Thread Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:02 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: Yep, to automatically delete backup_label and continue recovery seems to be dangerous. How about just emitting

Re: [BUGS] Recovery bug

2010-10-17 Thread Jeff Davis
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 15:58 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: I don't have a fix yet, because I think it requires a little discussion. For instance, it seems to be dangerous to assume that we're starting up from a backup with access to the archive when it might have been a crash of the primary system

[BUGS] Recovery bug

2010-10-15 Thread Jeff Davis
the initial ones) before making permanent changes. It was pretty painful trying to work backwards on this problem from the final controldata (where checkpoint and prior checkpoint are the same, and redo is before both), a crash, a PANIC, a backup_label.old, and not much else. Regards, Jeff

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5702: pg fails to use a conditional index even the where clause matches the condition

2010-10-10 Thread Jeff Davis
will evaluate to TRUE, and the latter will evaluate to FALSE. Enjoy. = select ROW(1, NULL) IS NOT NULL; ?column? -- f (1 row) = select NOT ROW(1, NULL) IS NULL; ?column? -- t (1 row) Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org

[BUGS] UNLISTEN bug

2010-09-22 Thread Jeff Davis
sure if it's safe to do that before DisableCatchupInterrupt(). Regards, Jeff Davis [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org/msg00225.html Note: I couldn't even find that in our email archive, but thanks to our new git repo, I found the commit fix by Bruce

Re: [BUGS] UNLISTEN bug

2010-09-22 Thread Jeff Davis
, and openly; even though it seemed like the most trivial bug that I could imagine at the time. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5652: Optimizer does wrong thing with partitioned tables

2010-09-10 Thread Jeff Davis
smarter. The optimizer will never be so good that it always picks the best path. Consider a 100-table join: would it be a bug if it didn't find the perfect join order? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5652: Optimizer does wrong thing with partitioned tables

2010-09-10 Thread Jeff Davis
, there are particular properties of MAX that allow the optimization: 1. MAX(x) can be rewritten as: ORDER BY x DESC LIMIT 1 2. The MAX of set S is the MAX of the MAXes of each partition of S The optimizer knows about the former, but not the latter. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5652: Optimizer does wrong thing with partitioned tables

2010-09-10 Thread Jeff Davis
without an obvious solution, where discussion is required. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Exclude constraint problem

2010-08-31 Thread Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 20:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes: On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 19:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: That's really *not* supposed to happen, assuming that both machines have IEEE float arithmetic and competently written float I/O code. On my machine

Re: [BUGS] Exclude constraint problem

2010-08-31 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes: On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 20:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: You need extra_float_digits cranked up. Which pg_dump knows about. I can't reproduce the problem with float4/8, but I still see a problem

Re: [BUGS] Exclude constraint problem

2010-08-30 Thread Jeff Davis
be different than the one you started with. That can cause a problem with either UNIQUE or EXCLUDE constraints. If you are not using floating point values, please try to make a self-contained test case that includes data that can reproduce the problem. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql

Re: [BUGS] page corruption after moving tablespace

2010-07-26 Thread Jeff Davis
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 23:50 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: I was investigating some strange page corruption today in which the page was completely zeroed except for the LSN and TLI. I see that this was added to the 9.0 open items list, but it affects versions 8.3 and later. I should have indicated

[BUGS] page corruption after moving tablespace

2010-07-23 Thread Jeff Davis
. Are there other areas where a similar problem might exist? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] page corruption after moving tablespace

2010-07-23 Thread Jeff Davis
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 23:50 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: I think the simple fix would be to have copy_relation_data call PageInit() if it's a new page. On second thought, why are PageSetLSN and PageSetTLI being called from log_newpage(), anyway? It says that all of the callers use smgr directly

[BUGS] Possible alpha5 SR bug

2010-04-12 Thread Jeff Davis
for the config we used. I was trying to sort this bug out somewhat before posting, but we weren't able to reproduce it (it happened near the end of testing, and people were leaving), and I didn't have much chance to investigate in the last week. Regards, Jeff Davis postg...@tao:/usr/local/pgsql

Re: [BUGS] possible bug not in open items

2010-02-28 Thread Jeff Davis
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 23:15 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: Was this ever addressed? It doesn't appear to be fixed, and I don't see it on the TODO, either. Should we add it there? Regards, Jeff Davis --- Jeff

Re: [BUGS] Status of submitted bugs

2010-01-28 Thread Jeff Davis
://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/datatype-xml.html http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/functions-xml.html Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] strange bug with gist over box and circle

2009-09-16 Thread Jeff Davis
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 10:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: This is expected, no? Those opclasses use the STORAGE option. I see, that makes sense. I was making the assumption that the types matched in my new patch, and obviously that's incorrect. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] strange bug with gist over box and circle

2009-09-15 Thread Jeff Davis
If I create a gist index over a box and a circle, the index attributes appear to both have type box. I don't see any other, similar situations with other types, and I haven't investigated the cause yet. Most similar situations work fine. Regards, Jeff Davis postgres=# select version

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5028: CASE returns ELSE value always when type is char

2009-09-04 Thread Jeff Davis
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 11:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: On the whole, throwing an error seems better from a usability perspective. Comments? Agreed. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5028: CASE returns ELSE value always when type ischar

2009-09-02 Thread Jeff Davis
, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] pg_ctl infinite loop and memory leak

2009-09-01 Thread Jeff Davis
the same readfile() function in initdb.c. I assume it's not a practical problem there, but it should be fixed. Thanks to Corry Haines (chaines at truviso dot com) for reporting the problem. Regards, Jeff Davis diff --git a/src/bin/initdb/initdb.c b/src/bin/initdb/initdb.c index 4b0b723..e544e3e

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5028: CASE returns ELSE value always when type is char

2009-09-01 Thread Jeff Davis
. Calling the RHS unknown in example #2 gives us that information. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] pg_ctl infinite loop and memory leak

2009-09-01 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 22:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Huh, interesting corner case. I'd be inclined to fix by initializing maxlength to 1 though. Where's the memory leak? The xstrdup() on the zero-length string. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Cursor with hold emits the same row more than once across commits in 8.3.7

2009-06-09 Thread Jeff Davis
of a synchronized scan is stored in shared memory; otherwise, it wouldn't know where to stop. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Cursor with hold emits the same row more than once across commits in 8.3.7

2009-06-09 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 10:51 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 12:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: We could probably fix this specific issue by refactoring things in such a way that the seqscan start point is frozen on the first read and re-used after rewinds. I don't know what you

Re: [BUGS] distinct on doesn't fail without order by? why?

2009-05-18 Thread Jeff Davis
, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] possible bug not in open items

2009-04-10 Thread Jeff Davis
even abort the transaction nicely. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] possible bug not in open items

2009-04-09 Thread Jeff Davis
of SIGTERM to a backend, the connection will be terminated anyway. Regards, Jeff Davis diff --git a/src/backend/commands/copy.c b/src/backend/commands/copy.c index c8223bf..c0d3622 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/copy.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/copy.c @@ -487,6 +487,17 @@ static int

Re: [BUGS] possible bug not in open items

2009-03-27 Thread Jeff Davis
COPY and no data is moving, it simply won't terminate it. You can terminate it with ctrl-C from psql, but not a SIGINT to the postmaster or a SIGINT or SIGTERM to the backend. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

Re: [BUGS] possible bug not in open items

2009-03-27 Thread Jeff Davis
. I'm only concerned about the shutdown case, and that's the only case that's in conflict with the docs. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] possible bug not in open items

2009-03-27 Thread Jeff Davis
DoingCommandRead protect us in the SIGINT case? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] pg_ctl -m fast stop doesn't shut down with active COPY

2009-03-12 Thread Jeff Davis
to the backend. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types

2009-02-26 Thread Jeff Davis
not in some expected place (I think it does so for all schemas other than pg_catalog). Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types

2009-02-26 Thread Jeff Davis
not sure whether it solves your problem, but I think it provides the most information. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Weird quirk with pg_dump of complex types

2009-02-26 Thread Jeff Davis
AS ( j mytype ); Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Status of issue 4593

2009-01-05 Thread Jeff Davis
about the SQL standard plenty of times though, so don't take my word for it ;) Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] Status of issue 4593

2009-01-05 Thread Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 15:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: The only way to avoid this would be to lock before the sort, which could have the effect of locking more rows than are returned (if you also use LIMIT); How would that work in the case of an index scan sort? Regards, Jeff Davis

[BUGS] possible array parsing bug

2008-11-11 Thread Jeff Davis
This does not look right to me: =# select regexp_split_to_array('dsf,sdfsdf',',')::text[][100]; regexp_split_to_array --- {dsf,sdfsdf} (1 row) Is this known? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make

Re: [BUGS] index bloat in 8.4-dev

2008-10-07 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:04 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Jeff Davis wrote: I see this problem on 8.3.3 now, too. Originally, I suppose my test was not long enough, but now I see the problem after about 10 minutes of running. I ran the script for about 30 minutes on CVS HEAD

Re: [BUGS] index bloat in 8.4-dev

2008-10-07 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 08:14 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: In the VACUUM VERBOSE output I included, you can see that the heap is only 785 pages (after 200M rows went through that table), and it maintains that consistently. That means to me that the VACUUMs are running and properly freeing the space

[BUGS] index bloat in 8.4-dev

2008-10-06 Thread Jeff Davis
? Regards, Jeff Davis i = 1 print set search_path = mytest, public; print drop table if exists foo; print create table foo (i int unique); while 1: print INSERT INTO foo select generate_series(%d, %d); % (i, i + 9) print DELETE FROM foo WHERE i %d; % (i) print VACUUM foo; i

Re: [BUGS] index bloat in 8.4-dev

2008-10-06 Thread Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:10 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Jeff Davis wrote: I am seeing index bloat in the current head when the indexed values are constantly increasing, and the lower values are being constantly deleted. ... It's possible that this has something to do

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4418: Memory leak in query planner

2008-09-16 Thread Jeff Davis
view. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] non-deterministic error related to MIN/MAX optimization

2008-08-26 Thread Jeff Davis
was unnecessary. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] non-deterministic error related to MIN/MAX optimization

2008-08-25 Thread Jeff Davis
to be, but the output shouldn't depend on the optimizer. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] unexpected RULE behavior

2008-07-07 Thread Jeff Davis
about it is that a rule doesn't save any values away in variables. Functions do save the arguments as variables on the stack, and those variables can be used multiple times, so that's why calling a function works. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3979: SELECT DISTINCT slow even on indexed column

2008-02-21 Thread Jeff Davis
, and if that doesn't work, post EXPLAIN results. Also, this post is somewhat off-topic for -bugs, try posting to -general or -performance with this type of question. Regards, Jeff Davis ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3855: backend sends corrupted data on EHOSTDOWN error

2008-01-08 Thread Jeff Davis
. Regards, Jeff Davis ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3855: backend sends corrupted data on EHOSTDOWNerror

2008-01-08 Thread Jeff Davis
is explicitly designed to prevent these kinds of problems, and we only see this problem because FreeBSD 6.1 TCP is broken. Regards, Jeff Davis ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3855: backend sends corrupted data onEHOSTDOWNerror

2008-01-08 Thread Jeff Davis
understand what's going on). Regards, Jeff Davis ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through

[BUGS] tsvector that can't be dumped/reloaded in 8.3beta

2007-11-02 Thread Jeff Davis
and beta2. I'm using en_US.UTF-8 on FreeBSD. Regards, Jeff Davis ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

  1   2   >