Em 12-01-2013 18:13, Tom Lane escreveu:
Andres Freundand...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2013-01-12 14:29:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I think that the alternative most likely to succeed is to consider any
change in the active value of search_path as forcing replanning of
cached plans.
I guess it
Em 09-01-2013 20:09, Kevin Grittner escreveu:
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
There have been discussions about changing that
if I understand it correctly, you do consider it a bug but you
don't want to backport a fix because it might break existent
behavior in some dbs, right
I didn't want to report the bug using the form before confirming it here.
Here is a gist of what I'm trying:
https://gist.github.com/49fcc8c4a5a810f66833#file-cleanup-sql
The relevant part being this:
old_path := pg_catalog.current_setting('search_path');
raise notice 'setting search_path
Em 07-01-2013 17:17, Tom Lane escreveu:
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosasrr.ro...@gmail.com writes:
perform pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', templ, true);
...
select count(distinct transaction_id) from public.transaction_condition
into temp_count;
raise notice '% remaining transactions in
