On Thursday 13. of May 2010 17:24:47 Tom Lane wrote:
Rumko rum...@gmail.com writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
There's something extremely wacko about that vacuum output.
Regarding storage paramaters, you mean ALTER TABLE x SET STORAGE...? Then
no.
No, I was wondering about ALTER TABLE ... SET
believe it was #5456, but am not 100% sure (bad memory and didn't save the
number).
Thank you
--
Regards,
Rumko
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Tom Lane wrote:
snip
There's something extremely wacko about that vacuum output. A toast
table should have few, if any, rows that short. And it's impossible
to believe there's no free space at all in the table, especially since
122*3259181 bytes is still quite a lot less than 3259181
