[BUGS] BUG #7494: WAL replay speed depends heavily on the shared_buffers size

2012-08-15 Thread valgog
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 7494 Logged by: Valentine Gogichashvili Email address: val...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.0.7 Operating system: Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-41) Description: We are experiencing strang

[BUGS] BUG #6661: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids

2012-05-22 Thread valgog
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6661 Logged by: Valentine Gogichashvili Email address: val...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.0.7 Operating system: Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-41sque Description: Hello, today when tryi

[BUGS] BUG #6375: tsearch does not recognize all valid emails

2012-01-03 Thread valgog
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6375 Logged by: Valentine Gogichashvili Email address: val...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.1.1 Operating system: Debian 4.4.5-8 Description: Hello, default tsearch parser does not recognize all vali

[BUGS] Re: BUG #5602: Recovering from Hot-Standby file backup leads to the currupted indexes

2010-08-05 Thread valgog
> This process seems almost entirely unrelated to the documented way of > doing it; I'm not surprised that you end up with some files not in sync. > Please see pg_start_backup and friends. > >                         regards, tom lane > Hallo Tom, It was done as documented in http://www.postgre

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5574: PANIC on hot-standby: heap_update_redo

2010-07-27 Thread valgog
On Jul 27, 5:02 pm, val...@gmail.com ("Valentine Gogichashvili") wrote: > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      5574 > Logged by:          Valentine Gogichashvili > Email address:      val...@gmail.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.0beta3 > Operating system:   RedHat Linux (2.

[BUGS] Re: BUG #5465: dblink TCP connection hangs blocking translation from being terminated

2010-05-27 Thread valgog
On May 19, 8:41 pm, m...@joeconway.com (Joseph Conway) wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Valentine Gogichashvili > > wrote: > >> The following bug has been logged online: > > >> Bug reference:      5465 > >> Logged by:          Valentine Gogichashvili > >> Email

[BUGS] Re: BUG #5465: dblink TCP connection hangs blocking transaction from being terminated

2010-05-27 Thread valgog
Oh, found an type in the subject. Transaction, not Translation. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4819: Ordering big tables by indexed columns is very slow.

2009-05-22 Thread valgog
On May 21, 3:04 am, alexei_nova...@yahoo.com ("Alexei") wrote: > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      4819 > Logged by:          Alexei > Email address:      alexei_nova...@yahoo.com > PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7 > Operating system:   Open SuSE 11.1 AMD Athlon 64 X2 > Des

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4342: upper, lower, initcap do not work with umlaute?

2008-08-07 Thread valgog
On Aug 6, 4:48 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("paull") wrote: > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      4342 > Logged by:          paull > Email address:     [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.2? not sure > Operating system:   ubuntu > Description:        upper, lower, init

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4343: upper, lower, initcap do not work with umlaute? (important!)

2008-08-07 Thread valgog
On Aug 6, 5:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("paull") wrote: > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      4343 > Logged by:          paull > Email address:     [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.2? not sure > Operating system:   ubuntu > Description:        upper, lower, init

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4328: help in creating database encoded with LATIN1

2008-07-29 Thread valgog
On Jul 28, 8:27 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("andrew victoria") wrote: > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      4328 > Logged by:          andrew victoria > Email address:     [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.3.1 > Operating system:   fedora core 9 > Description:      

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4319: lower()/upper() does not know about UNICODE case mapping

2008-07-25 Thread valgog
On Jul 25, 10:17 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zdenek Kotala) wrote: > Valentine Gogichashvili napsal(a): > > > Hi, > > Hi > > > I understand, that it is more a feature, but it does not help me anyways... > > > On the UNICODE databases lower and upper functions are using system locale > > settings (that c

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4319: lower()/upper() does not know about UNICODE case mapping

2008-07-23 Thread valgog
I checked for de_DE.utf8 (created a test database with initdb) and lower/upper is working correctly there on both 8.2 and 8.3 in different languages On Jul 22, 11:26 am, valgog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 21, 4:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote: > >

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4319: lower()/upper() does not know about UNICODE case mapping

2008-07-23 Thread valgog
On Jul 22, 11:53 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) wrote: > Am Tuesday, 22. July 2008 schrieb valgog: > > > Why Postgres allows creating UNICODE database with the locale, that > > can possibly corrupt my data? > > It doesn't allow it, as of 8.3.  In 8.2 it does

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4319: lower()/upper() does not know about UNICODE case mapping

2008-07-22 Thread valgog
On Jul 21, 4:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote: > Valentine Gogichashvili escribió: > > > On 8.2.3 database with LC_CTYPE set to en_EN, lower() function is actually > > corrupting UTF8 data, lowering UTF8 control bytes... I did have a chance to > > check if how it works on the 8.3 as

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4319: lower()/upper() does not know about UNICODE case mapping

2008-07-22 Thread valgog
On Jul 21, 4:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote: > Valentine Gogichashvili escribió: > > > On 8.2.3 database with LC_CTYPE set to en_EN, lower() function is actually > > corrupting UTF8 data, lowering UTF8 control bytes... I did have a chance to > > check if how it works on the 8.3 as

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4123: Statement.setQueryTimeout does not work with Postgres Java Driver

2008-04-27 Thread valgog
On Apr 25, 11:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Kevin Grittner") wrote: > >>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:59 AM, in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > valgog > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 24, 12:28 pm, [EMAIL PR

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4123: Statement.setQueryTimeout does not work with Postgres Java Driver

2008-04-25 Thread valgog
Ok, understood... that could not be so easy anyway :) I supposed that it should be something, that lays in the JDBC specs... Regards, -- Valentine On Apr 24, 12:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kris Jurka) wrote: > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, valgog wrote: > > Is it possible to impl

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4123: Statement.setQueryTimeout does not work with Postgres Java Driver

2008-04-23 Thread valgog
On Apr 22, 5:53 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kris Jurka) wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Amit Mujawar wrote: > > > The following bug has been logged online: > > > Bug reference:      4123 > > PostgreSQL version: 8.1 > > Description:        Statement.setQueryTimeout does not work with Postgres > > Java Driv

[BUGS] Re: BUG #4123: Statement.setQueryTimeout does not work with Postgres Java Driver

2008-04-23 Thread valgog
On Apr 22, 12:05 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Amit Mujawar") wrote: > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      4123 > Logged by:          Amit Mujawar > Email address:     [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.1 > Operating system:   Windows XP > Description:        Statemen

[BUGS] Cannot select from 'UPDATE RETURNING'

2007-09-12 Thread valgog
Hi, I am no sure if it is a bug at all, but according to the documented features of UPDATE I would suppose it is. UPDATE RETURNING clause cannot be used in SELECT * FROM ( query ) AS query_alias statement. For example: update issues set issue_value = 'value to assign' where id in ( ) returning