On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:03, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> different for different countries. There was a discussion of this on
> the patches list recently
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-02/msg00038.php and
> the surrounding thread). The SQL spec calls for the Gregorian calendar
>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:06:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I guess adding 1 day to 1752-09-02 should give us 1752-09-14, but your
> > right, it gives us 1752-09-03.
>
> As was pointed out at length just recently, the transition from Julian
> to Gregori
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 22:08, Tim Ellis wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:03, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > different for different countries. There was a discussion of this on
> > the patches list recently
> > (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-02/msg00038.php and
> > the surrounding t
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 22:59, Robert Treat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] rms_db]$ cal 9 1752
>September 1752
> Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
>1 2 14 15 16
> 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
> 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
>
> I guess adding 1 day to 1752-09-02 should give us 1752-09-14, but your
> right, it gives us
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess adding 1 day to 1752-09-02 should give us 1752-09-14, but your
> right, it gives us 1752-09-03.
As was pointed out at length just recently, the transition from Julian
to Gregorian calendars happened at different times in different places.
So the a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rms_db]$ cal 9 1752
September 1752
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
I guess adding 1 day to 1752-09-02 should give us 1752-09-14, but your
right, it gives us 1752-09-03.
Forwarding this to -bugs
Robert Treat
On Sun, 200
