Re: [BUGS] BUG #3961: ecpg lacks SQLSTATE macro definition

2008-02-15 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:13:53AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael, we branched 8.3 yesterday, so you need a third commit if you > don't want people to see a regression from 8.2.7 to 8.3.x. Thanks for the note, just committed to 8.3 branch as well. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fa

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3961: ecpg lacks SQLSTATE macro definition

2008-02-14 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hallo Christoph, > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:09:11AM +, Christoph Dalitz wrote: >> Description:ecpg lacks SQLSTATE macro definition > Thanks for reporting this oversight. I added the definition to CVS, also > for 8.2. Michael, we branched

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3961: ecpg lacks SQLSTATE macro definition

2008-02-14 Thread Michael Meskes
Hallo Christoph, On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:09:11AM +, Christoph Dalitz wrote: > Description:ecpg lacks SQLSTATE macro definition Thanks for reporting this oversight. I added the definition to CVS, also for 8.2. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael

[BUGS] BUG #3961: ecpg lacks SQLSTATE macro definition

2008-02-14 Thread Christoph Dalitz
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3961 Logged by: Christoph Dalitz Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2.6 Operating system: Linux Description:ecpg lacks SQLSTATE macro definition Details: While ecpg defines the (deprecated)