Re: [BUGS] BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO

2008-04-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Daniel Ruoso wrote: > On the other hand, some important ISO8601-based specifications only > accept the dateTtime notation, for instance XML Schema. > > As I was talking on #postgresql, I think it would be nice to have that > output option as one of the date/time output styles (name it ISO8601 or >

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO

2008-04-20 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Sáb, 2008-04-19 às 12:10 -0500, Jaime Casanova escreveu: > """ > Unlike the previous examples, "2007-04-05 14:30" is considered two > separate, but acceptable, representations—one for date and the other > for time. It is then left to the reader to interpret the two separate > representations as me

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO

2008-04-19 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 4115 > Logged by: Daniel Ruoso > Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.3.1 > Operating system: Debian GNU/Linux lenny > D

[BUGS] BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO

2008-04-19 Thread Daniel Ruoso
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4115 Logged by: Daniel Ruoso Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.3.1 Operating system: Debian GNU/Linux lenny Description:PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO Details: ISO8601[1] defines