Peter Eisentraut wrote:
No really, the built-in geometry types are considered kind of legacy.
Indeed, I was reviewing the postgres 'history' on the website the other
day, and noted that stuff was put in Postgres *BEFORE* it was SQL.
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresq
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No really, the built-in geometry types are considered kind of legacy. If you
> want to deal with something more modern, you may want to look into PostGIS.
Or, if you want to fix them, feel free to submit a patch. But there is
no one among the curren
On Friday 28 November 2008 15:31:51 Barry Sanford wrote:
> looking at PostgreSQL, I noticed that you have various geometric data types
> as standard. However, I was somewhat surprised that you are attempting to
> implement the 'line' type via a two point scheme. While this is okay for
> line segm
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4551
Logged by: Barry Sanford
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.3
Operating system: OS X
Description:Implementation of the "line" type..
Details:
My company does structural analysis of arc
