Alvaro Herrera writes:
> I think this system is silly, error prone (it's way too easy to hit the
> wrong key, particularly if traffic is large) and slow. If we want to
> reject spam in a web form, we shouldn't be using a mailing list spam
> moderation system. I think we should be using a "captch
Andrew Gierth escribió:
> > "Joshua" == Joshua Tolley writes:
>
> >> > To pick a recent case, bug #5085 was submitted by an IRC user (at my
> >> > suggestion) at 2009-09-28 22:12 +, or a bit over 22 hours ago as I
> write
>
> Joshua> I am a -bugs moderator, and don't see that I ever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Anyway the important point here is whether there's any significant
> number of posts that get lost for a reason other than being rejected
> as spam. Only the moderators would have any idea how many get rejected
> as spam, so I'd still like to
> "Joshua" == Joshua Tolley writes:
>> > To pick a recent case, bug #5085 was submitted by an IRC user (at my
>> > suggestion) at 2009-09-28 22:12 +, or a bit over 22 hours ago as I
>> > write
Joshua> I am a -bugs moderator, and don't see that I ever got a
Joshua> notice that I nee
Andrew Gierth writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
> Tom> A quick grep in my mail logs shows that since Jan 1, I have
> Tom> received 440 bug-reporter emails, bearing numbers from 4598 to
> Tom> 5087 (a range of 490 numbers). So Andrew's "one-third" is a
> Tom> large exaggeration,
> My "one-
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:33:09PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > To pick a recent case, bug #5085 was submitted by an IRC user (at my
> > suggestion) at 2009-09-28 22:12 +, or a bit over 22 hours ago as I write
I am a -bugs moderator, and don't see that I ever got a notice that I needed
to
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
>> They get processed in the moderator queue of -bugs along with all
>> other posts there... We're probably just back in the situation
>> where we need more moderators for it...
Tom> A quick grep in my mail logs shows that since Jan 1, I have
Tom> received 44
Magnus Hagander writes:
> 2009/9/29 Andrew Gierth :
>> To pick a recent case, bug #5085 was submitted by an IRC user (at my
>> suggestion) at 2009-09-28 22:12 +, or a bit over 22 hours ago as I write
>> this; it has yet to appear. This isn't an isolated case; I regularly refer
>> IRC users wit
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 13:36 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> I'd be happy to be added as moderator for -bug
I'd be happy to quit moderating this list (I'm serious).
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:33:09PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2009/9/29 Andrew Gierth :
> >
> > To pick a recent case, bug #5085 was submitted by an IRC user (at my
> > suggestion) at 2009-09-28 22:12 +, or a bit over 22 hours ago as I write
> > this; it has yet to appear. This isn't an is
2009/9/29 Andrew Gierth :
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 5087
> Logged by: Andrew Gierth
> Email address: and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk
> PostgreSQL version: any
> Operating system: any
> Description: Submitted bug reports not showing up i
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5087
Logged by: Andrew Gierth
Email address: and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk
PostgreSQL version: any
Operating system: any
Description:Submitted bug reports not showing up in a timely manner
(or at all)
Details:
B
12 matches
Mail list logo
