Re: [BUGS] BUG #5259: the table name double

2010-01-04 Thread Tom Lane
Craig Ringer writes: > On 4/01/2010 2:26 PM, David wrote: >> the table name double,why? > How about some information? A reasonable bet is that the pg_namespace row for "public" has gotten duplicated (either in reality, or there's an extra index entry for it). Which would cause the join in psql's

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5259: the table name double

2010-01-04 Thread Craig Ringer
On 4/01/2010 6:18 PM, Goodomens wrote: Craig Ringer I come from Shanghai of China,my english is not well,sorry. >Is this the output of psql's `\dp' command? If so, where are the actual >privelege rows - did you delete them, or is the output you pasted >actually EXACTLY what came out of psql? y

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5259: the table name double

2010-01-03 Thread Craig Ringer
On 4/01/2010 2:26 PM, David wrote: The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5259 Logged by: David Email address: goodom...@21cn.com PostgreSQL version: 8.0 Operating system: RHEL5 Description:the table name double Details: hi the table name doub

[BUGS] BUG #5259: the table name double

2010-01-03 Thread David
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5259 Logged by: David Email address: goodom...@21cn.com PostgreSQL version: 8.0 Operating system: RHEL5 Description:the table name double Details: hi the table name double,why?