Re: [BUGS] BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.

2010-02-25 Thread Robert Haas
2010/2/25 Oleg Serov : > Thanks!, when it will be released on 8.3.X? Looks like the last set of back-branch releases was wrapped 12/10/09, the set before that on 9/4/09, and the previous set on 3/13/09 (but there was a major release in the mix there). So I'd guess we're getting close to it being

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.

2010-02-25 Thread Oleg Serov
Thanks!, when it will be released on 8.3.X? On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Oleg Serov writes: > > When it could be fixed? > > Oh, it is fixed, but I forgot to reply to this thread about it. > Sorry about that. > >regards, tom lane > -- С уважением

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.

2010-02-24 Thread Tom Lane
Oleg Serov writes: > When it could be fixed? Oh, it is fixed, but I forgot to reply to this thread about it. Sorry about that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.o

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.

2010-02-24 Thread Oleg Serov
When it could be fixed? On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> 2010/2/10 Oleg Serov : >>> Somebody will fix this bug or not? > >> I'm not sure whether this is a bug. > > Yeah, I think it is.  The problem is that exec_move_row is taking too > many shortcuts with

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.

2010-02-11 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > 2010/2/10 Oleg Serov : >> Somebody will fix this bug or not? > I'm not sure whether this is a bug. Yeah, I think it is. The problem is that exec_move_row is taking too many shortcuts with nulls. If the input record is short of fields it is willing to pass this data to exe

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.

2010-02-11 Thread Robert Haas
2010/2/10 Oleg Serov : > Somebody will fix this bug or not? I'm not sure whether this is a bug. This is an explicit cast: SELECT '(1,)'::bug_level_one; But I think this is an implicit cast: SELECT bug_procedure('(1,)'); I'm not totally sure of the details, but implicit, assignment, and explic

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.

2010-02-10 Thread Oleg Serov
Somebody will fix this bug or not? On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Oleg wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 5314 > Logged by: Oleg > Email address: sero...@gmail.com > PostgreSQL version: 8.3/8.4 > Operating system: any > Description:

[BUGS] BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.

2010-02-04 Thread Oleg
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5314 Logged by: Oleg Email address: sero...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.3/8.4 Operating system: any Description:Error in nested composite types in plpgsql. Details: Here is it reproduce code: It works only