On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 21:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
>> wrote:
>>> A patch attached. The name of "PGMODULEEXPORT" might be arguable.
>
>> I agree with this in principle, but won't this break every single
>> add-on module ou
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
> wrote:
>> A patch attached. The name of "PGMODULEEXPORT" might be arguable.
> I agree with this in principle, but won't this break every single
> add-on module out there that supports Win32?
The patch didn't touch th
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
wrote:
>
> "Vladimir Barzionov" wrote:
>
>> Same problem was already discussed for example here
>> http://dbaspot.com/forums/postgresql/393683-re-general-custom-c-function-palloc-broken.html
>>
>> Looks like the simplest way for correcting the is
"Vladimir Barzionov" wrote:
> Same problem was already discussed for example here
> http://dbaspot.com/forums/postgresql/393683-re-general-custom-c-function-palloc-broken.html
>
> Looks like the simplest way for correcting the issue is declaring additional
> macro (something like PGMODULEEXPORT
