Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On fre, 2012-02-17 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> lenka.piy...@gmail.com writes:
>>> when i restore a particular table using pg_restore (using option "-t") it
>>> doesn't restore my primary key...
>> This is not a bug. -t selects the table only, not associated ind
2012-02-19 09:30 keltezéssel, Peter Eisentraut írta:
> On fre, 2012-02-17 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> lenka.piy...@gmail.com writes:
>>> when i restore a particular table using pg_restore (using option "-t") it
>>> doesn't restore my primary key...
>> This is not a bug. -t selects the tabl
On fre, 2012-02-17 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> lenka.piy...@gmail.com writes:
> > when i restore a particular table using pg_restore (using option "-t") it
> > doesn't restore my primary key...
>
> This is not a bug. -t selects the table only, not associated indexes.
But from a user's per
lenka.piy...@gmail.com writes:
> when i restore a particular table using pg_restore (using option "-t") it
> doesn't restore my primary key...
This is not a bug. -t selects the table only, not associated indexes.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (p
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6461
Logged by: Piyush
Email address: lenka.piy...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2
Operating system: Windows XP
Description:
when i restore a particular table using pg_restore (using option "-t") it
