On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:12 PM, kont...@sandberg-consult.dk wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6530
Logged by: Kasper Sandberg
Email address: kont...@sandberg-consult.dk
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3
Operating system: Debian squeeze
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
We do have this:
para
The operators literalamp;amp;/, literal@gt;/ and
literallt;@/ are equivalent to productnamePostgreSQL/'s built-in
operators of the same names, except that they work only on integer arrays
that do not contain
yes, I could not figure out why my GIN index was not used, this is what
i meant.
On 09/04/12 18:16, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com writes:
We do have this:
para
The operatorsliteralamp;amp;/,literal@gt;/ and
literallt;@/ are equivalent
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6530
Logged by: Kasper Sandberg
Email address: kont...@sandberg-consult.dk
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3
Operating system: Debian squeeze
Description:
Hello.
I recently had a problem with array operators
