The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7920
Logged by: Maksym Boguk
Email address: maxim.bo...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.3
Operating system: Linux
Description:
sequence_name left stale after sequence rename:
Test case shows same
On 2013-03-06 09:15:01 +, maxim.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 7920
Logged by: Maksym Boguk
Email address: maxim.bo...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.3
Operating system: Linux
Description:
I don't find this particularly suprising. Nothing looks at that field in
sequences, there imo is no point on having the name inside at all.
Do you need that for some usecase or did you just happen to notice it?
I personally don't see any way to nicely fix that. We can add code to
also
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2013-03-06 09:27:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Removing the sequence_name column alone would also break existing code,
for ... um ... not much.
The only argument I see is reduced chance of people making errors. Code
that actually uses sequence_name
