> We have a customer in Japan who would be interested in this fix, in the
> future. Would you like me to enter it as an official Postgres bug?
> Sincerely,
As I stated before, I don't regard this as a bug.
BTW I wonder why you don't use CREATE CONVERSION which can be used for
customer's problem
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 03:33, Kasia Tuszynska wrote:
> We have a customer in Japan who would be interested in this fix, in the
> future. Would you like me to enter it as an official Postgres bug?
Not a bug at all -- there are at least 3 versions of "EUCJP" encodings, and
postgres just supports
...@gmail.come
Cc: Kasia Tuszynska; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] ERROR: character 0xe3809c of encoding "UTF8" has no
equivalent in EUC_JP
> Agreed if the encoding is added as an user-defined encoding.
> I don't want to add built-in encodings only for Japanese
> Agreed if the encoding is added as an user-defined encoding.
> I don't want to add built-in encodings only for Japanese language any more.
I do not agree here. Adding one more encoding/conversion is not big
deal.
Anyway these soltions would come to be real after one or two releases
at the earli
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 13:02, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> I think what we can do best here is, adding new encoding and default
> conversion.
Agreed if the encoding is added as an user-defined encoding.
I don't want to add built-in encodings only for Japanese language any more.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
-
>> So if we want to do a round trip conversion between
>> EUC-JP and UTF-8, we have to choose either U+FF5E OR U+301C. We have
>> chosen U+FF5E. If we change the mapping, many existing applications
>> would break.
>
> I heard a request a few times for an additional one-directional conversion
> fro
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:58, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> So if we want to do a round trip conversion between
> EUC-JP and UTF-8, we have to choose either U+FF5E OR U+301C. We have
> chosen U+FF5E. If we change the mapping, many existing applications
> would break.
I heard a request a few times for an
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:05, Kasia Tuszynska wrote:
> I was wondering if this was considered a bug, and if so what were the plans
> to fix it: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-08/msg00211.php
The wave dash issue is not postgres-specific; some other converter just
replace it with '
> Hi,
> I was wondering if this was considered a bug, and if so what were the plans
> to fix it: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-08/msg00211.php
>
> I searched the: pgsql-bug archive and found nothing
> I also searched the wiki to do list and found nothing
> But I could have missed
Hi,
I was wondering if this was considered a bug, and if so what were the plans to
fix it: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-08/msg00211.php
I searched the: pgsql-bug archive and found nothing
I also searched the wiki to do list and found nothing
But I could have missed it.
Sincerel
10 matches
Mail list logo
