Richard Huxton writes:
> The error is different in 8.0.x and 8.1.x but occurs in both.
Fixed in CVS tip --- will look at the 8.0 branch later.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Earlier today Hakan Kocaman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) posted a query on
general "Issue with functions in Rule".
Turned out the problem is with a function that takes a compound type
based on a view with ORDER BY. If you add/remove ORDER BY to the view
definition in the attached it doesn't recognise t
