Re: [BUGS] Fwd: postgresql-autodoc - missinterprets "version"

2004-07-09 Thread Tom Lane
Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2004-07-08 7:10 -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote: >> It doesn't appear to be necessary to quote the identifier, however version >> and "version" refer to the same identifier in this case so I wouldn't call >> it an error, either. > This makes sense, thank yo

Re: [BUGS] Fwd: postgresql-autodoc - missinterprets "version"

2004-07-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi Stephan! On 2004-07-08 7:10 -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote: > It doesn't appear to be necessary to quote the identifier, however version > and "version" refer to the same identifier in this case so I wouldn't call > it an error, either. My guess as to the reason comes from this comment > fragment

Re: [BUGS] Fwd: postgresql-autodoc - missinterprets "version"

2004-07-08 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi PostgreSQL developers! > > Recently we got the bug report below. It seems that there is a special > treatment of columns named "version". Normally fields of primary key > indices are printed out unquoted, however, if the column is named > "version", the

[BUGS] Fwd: postgresql-autodoc - missinterprets "version"

2004-07-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi PostgreSQL developers! Recently we got the bug report below. It seems that there is a special treatment of columns named "version". Normally fields of primary key indices are printed out unquoted, however, if the column is named "version", the name is printed out in quotes. This behaviour see