On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié ago 04 12:37:23 -0400 2010:
>> My recollection is that that change was associated with some pretty
>> significant revisions to the postmaster state machine. I'm concerned
>> about the risks involved in
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié ago 04 12:37:23 -0400 2010:
> Fujii Masao writes:
> > 6. ... the bgwriter had already ended even though there was a backend in
> >progress. Postmaster regarded this situation as abnormal and caused the
> >recovery.
>
> > In 8.3 or later, since postm
Fujii Masao writes:
> 6. ... the bgwriter had already ended even though there was a backend in
>progress. Postmaster regarded this situation as abnormal and caused the
>recovery.
> In 8.3 or later, since postmaster doesn't regard that situation as abnormal
> and just waits for all backend
Hi,
In my customer's system using v8.2.5, even though no process exited abnormally,
the fast shutdown wrongly caused the automatic restart of a database. The server
log is as follows:
Jul 18 16:21:51 postgres[26624]: [1-1] LOG: received fast shutdown request
Jul 18 16:21:51 postgres[26624]: [2
