On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> > What I'd be for is breaking the docs out as a separate top-level target,
>> > ie "make docs", "make install-docs". I don't much care for Lou's
>> > suggestion
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > What I'd be for is breaking the docs out as a separate top-level target,
> > ie "make docs", "make install-docs". I don't much care for Lou's
> > suggestion of tying it to a configure option because that imposes the
> >
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> By splitting out the doc building into a separate target, we will have
> less users installing the documentation.
I don't see why. And even if it's true, it just means some people
were installing the docs "by accident" before even though
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
>>> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
>
>> But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
>> have the docs availabl
On fre, 2010-03-05 at 08:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
> >> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
>
> > But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
> > have the docs
obert Haas"
, "Joe Conway" ,
pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, March 5, 2010 8:09:54 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
>> ./confi
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
>> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
> But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
> have the docs available by default, so they can read them.
"End users" in th
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
> While I'd agree a 'make all' should, uh... make _all_, and that make
> building based on lots of guessing is counterintuitive, an option to
> configure like:
>
> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
>
> - with som
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that the whole idea of make targets building different things
> depending on what you've built previously is confusing,
> counterintuitive, and illogical. make all should either build the
> docs, or not; trying to guess what the user
riginal Message -
From: "Robert Haas"
To: "Peter Eisentraut"
Cc: "Tom Lane" , "Joe Conway" , "Lou
Picciano" , pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2010 12:09:00 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2010-02-24 at 12:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Joe Conway writes:
>> > Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development
>> > machine that "make install" takes *much* longer, but only sporadically,
>> > due to the
On ons, 2010-02-24 at 12:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway writes:
> > Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development
> > machine that "make install" takes *much* longer, but only sporadically,
> > due to the docs building.
>
> This might be related to Peter's changes t
Lou Picciano writes:
> Now, you've reminded me of something: That one or more versions of tar have
> trouble with very long file/directory names
> I've run into this with one of the source trees we've been working in - was
> it here in PostgreSQL? Could this be a culprit?
I believe we dealt w
From: "Joseph Conway"
To: "Tom Lane"
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" , "Lou Picciano"
, pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, bsde...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:29:43 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> * $(GENERATED_SGML) is removed by make clean, therefore also by
>> make distclean
>> Ergo, this type of failure is *guaranteed* when trying to build
>> from a distribution tarball. This needs to be rethought.
>
> I looked at this some more, and this time I noticed th
I wrote:
> * $(GENERATED_SGML) is removed by make clean, therefore also by
> make distclean
> Ergo, this type of failure is *guaranteed* when trying to build
> from a distribution tarball. This needs to be rethought.
I looked at this some more, and this time I noticed that the makefile
has
.SECO
I wrote:
> That doesn't in itself explain a problem with building from the
> alpha tarball though. Is it possible there's a clock skew problem
> in the tarball's file timestamps?
I poked around in the alpha4 tarball and didn't find clock skew.
What I found out was that there's some fundamental fu
Joe Conway writes:
> Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development
> machine that "make install" takes *much* longer, but only sporadically,
> due to the docs building.
This might be related to Peter's changes to the docs build procedure.
The way things work now is that if
On 02/24/2010 08:43 AM, Lou Picciano wrote:
> Tom -
>
> Didn't realize I was arm waving - was I? (Sometimes email falls well
> short...)
>
> We've managed a build of PostgreSQL 9.0-alpha4 - nice! However, the #
> make install command apparently(?) hiccups
> on a dependency on Jade (we ain't u
rol over docs build in the
config script - specific kinds of docs/no docs at all/etc?
Thanks for any help, and for the great work! We love PostgreSQL!
Lou
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane"
To: "Lou Picciano"
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesda
Lou Picciano writes:
> Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of
> PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't have jade on this
> system)
> Can the config script test for jade or, better yet, allow an option to turn
> off build of documentation?
Would you sh
Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of
PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't have jade on this
system)
Can the config script test for jade or, better yet, allow an option to turn off
build of documentation?
22 matches
Mail list logo
