Robert Haas escribió:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What I'd be for is breaking the docs out as a separate top-level target,
ie make docs, make install-docs. I don't much care for Lou's
suggestion of tying it to a configure option because that imposes
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Robert Haas escribió:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What I'd be for is breaking the docs out as a separate top-level target,
ie make docs, make install-docs. I don't much
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
I think that the whole idea of make targets building different things
depending on what you've built previously is confusing,
counterintuitive, and illogical. make all should either build the
docs, or not; trying to guess what the user
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
While I'd agree a 'make all' should, uh... make _all_, and that make
building based on lots of guessing is counterintuitive, an option to
configure like:
./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
- with some of
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
have the docs available by default, so they can read them.
End
...@gmail.com, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com,
pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, March 5, 2010 8:09:54 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote
On fre, 2010-03-05 at 08:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
have the
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
By splitting out the doc building into a separate target, we will have
less users installing the documentation.
I don't see why. And even if it's true, it just means some people
were installing the docs by accident before
On ons, 2010-02-24 at 12:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com writes:
Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development
machine that make install takes *much* longer, but only sporadically,
due to the docs building.
This might be related to Peter's
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-02-24 at 12:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com writes:
Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development
machine that make install takes *much* longer, but only
: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-02-24 at 12:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com writes:
Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development
machine
I wrote:
* $(GENERATED_SGML) is removed by make clean, therefore also by
make distclean
Ergo, this type of failure is *guaranteed* when trying to build
from a distribution tarball. This needs to be rethought.
I looked at this some more, and this time I noticed that the makefile
has
Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
* $(GENERATED_SGML) is removed by make clean, therefore also by
make distclean
Ergo, this type of failure is *guaranteed* when trying to build
from a distribution tarball. This needs to be rethought.
I looked at this some more, and this time I noticed that the
Conway m...@joeconway.com
To: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net, Lou Picciano
loupicci...@comcast.net, pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, bsde...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:29:43 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade
Lou Picciano loupicci...@comcast.net writes:
Now, you've reminded me of something: That one or more versions of tar have
trouble with very long file/directory names
I've run into this with one of the source trees we've been working in - was
it here in PostgreSQL? Could this be a culprit?
Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of
PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't have jade on this
system)
Can the config script test for jade or, better yet, allow an option to turn off
build of documentation?
Lou Picciano loupicci...@comcast.net writes:
Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of
PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't have jade on this
system)
Can the config script test for jade or, better yet, allow an option to turn
off build of
US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Lou Picciano loupicci...@comcast.net writes:
Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of
PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't have jade on this
system)
Can the config script test
On 02/24/2010 08:43 AM, Lou Picciano wrote:
Tom -
Didn't realize I was arm waving - was I? (Sometimes email falls well
short...)
We've managed a build of PostgreSQL 9.0-alpha4 - nice! However, the #
make install command apparently(?) hiccups
on a dependency on Jade (we ain't usin'
Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com writes:
Related to this I have noticed in recent weeks on my own development
machine that make install takes *much* longer, but only sporadically,
due to the docs building.
This might be related to Peter's changes to the docs build procedure.
The way things work
I wrote:
That doesn't in itself explain a problem with building from the
alpha tarball though. Is it possible there's a clock skew problem
in the tarball's file timestamps?
I poked around in the alpha4 tarball and didn't find clock skew.
What I found out was that there's some fundamental
22 matches
Mail list logo
