On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So if we take the complaint seriously, we'd better patch 8.2 as well.
I'm sort of inclined to think we should take the complaint seriously.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Tatsuhito Kasahara kasahara.tatsuh...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
When I tested simple query as following, backend process used much memory
and not freed until the backend was finished.
# This is reproduced on PostgreSQL8.3
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
The proposed patch looks very simple. I don't think that applying that
patch will cause serious risk.
Maybe so, maybe not, but *it won't get tested* to any meaningful degree
if it's applied.
Unless the bug is fixed, the users who encountered the
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Tatsuhito Kasahara kasahara.tatsuh...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
When I tested simple query as following, backend process used much memory
and not freed
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Are you saying that this problem does not exist in 8.3.0 but does
exist in later 8.3.x revs?
I believe it dates from
Author: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch: master Release: REL8_4_BR [c98a92378] 2008-12-13 02:00:20 +
Branch: REL8_3_STABLE
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
The proposed patch looks very simple. I don't think that applying that
patch will cause serious risk.
Maybe so, maybe not, but *it won't get tested* to any meaningful degree
if it's
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
The proposed patch looks very simple. I don't think that applying that
patch will cause serious risk.
Maybe
Tatsuhito Kasahara kasahara.tatsuh...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
When I tested simple query as following, backend process used much memory
and not freed until the backend was finished.
# This is reproduced on PostgreSQL8.3 (PostgreSQL8.3.6 - PostgreSQL8.3.12)
Hmm ... this test case doesn't appear
Hi!
When I tested simple query as following, backend process used much memory
and not freed until the backend was finished.
# This is reproduced on PostgreSQL8.3 (PostgreSQL8.3.6 - PostgreSQL8.3.12)
---
BEGIN;
SAVEPOINT sp0;
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (1);
RELEASE sp0;
SAVEPOINT sp1;
