Re: Bruce Momjian 2013-10-02 <20131002170628.gc5...@momjian.us>
> That is very interesting, and it certainly should not be failing.
>
> I am surprised it got an oid that was one less than the desired one,
> 18803. Is there any mention of 18803 in the SQL file?
18803 wasn't mentioned anywhere, ju
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:59:30PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> On upgrading a 9.0 database to 9.2 using pg_upgrade, I got this:
>
> # pg_upgradecluster -m upgrade 9.0 main /psql/data-9.2
> [...]
> Performing Upgrade
> --
> [...]
> Restoring database schema to new cluster
On upgrading a 9.0 database to 9.2 using pg_upgrade, I got this:
# pg_upgradecluster -m upgrade 9.0 main /psql/data-9.2
[...]
Performing Upgrade
--
[...]
Restoring database schema to new clusterok
Removing support functions from new cluster ok
Co
