Title: RE: [BUGS] solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2
Tom,
Yeah, I've already fired off a query about this gcc build to the source.
In my case, I downloaded it from www.sunfreeware.com, and, for good measure, I also tried gcc 3.4.2 for solaris 9, on a solaris 10 box, and, indeed, it looks lik
Title: RE: [BUGS] solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2
I got a response from Steve (of SunFreeware) and he also has put some info up on the site about regenerating the cleaned-up files.
I've done this with the gcc 3.3.2 for solaris 10, and have now successfully built postgresql rc1.
I haven&#x
Mike Mascari wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
This is standard practice for gcc: it tries to use "cleaned up"
versions
of system headers that will not elicit useless warnings from gcc. It's
a good idea, actually, because the degree of insanity in
vendor-supplied
system headers is pretty depres
Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
This is standard practice for gcc: it tries to use "cleaned up" versions
of system headers that will not elicit useless warnings from gcc. It's
a good idea, actually, because the degree of insanity in vendor-supplied
system headers is pretty depressing. But if the gcc
I wrote:
> This is standard practice for gcc: it tries to use "cleaned up" versions
> of system headers that will not elicit useless warnings from gcc. It's
> a good idea, actually, because the degree of insanity in vendor-supplied
> system headers is pretty depressing. But if the gcc install pro
"Belbin, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that rather than using the /usr/include/sys/types.h, gcc 3.3.2 is
> instead, using a version of the same file, located at
> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.3.2/include/sys, which does
> not have a definition for ctid_t
This is s
Title: RE: [BUGS] solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2
It seems that rather than using the /usr/include/sys/types.h, gcc 3.3.2 is instead, using a version of the same file, located at /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.3.2/include/sys, which does not have a definition for ctid_t
Presumedly
"Belbin, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I be able to compile with gcc 3.3.2 (from sunfreeware) on solaris 10?
Yes ...
> gcc -DPOSIX -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wendif-labels
> -fno-strict-aliasing -I../../src/port -DFRONTEND -I../../src/include -c -o
> exec.o exec.c
Should I be able to
compile with gcc 3.3.2 (from sunfreeware) on solaris 10?
I'm using sparc, and
am getting some strange looking compiler errors when trying to do the
make.
I'm getting some
compiler parse errors when compiling exec.c.
make -C doc
allmake[1]: Entering directory
`
