Guillaume Smet ha scritto:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
The question is how you want to implement this in a data type independent
fashion. You can't assume that increasing the typmod is a noop for all data
types.
Sure. See my previous answer on
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Guillaume Smet ha scritto:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
The question is how you want to implement this in a data type independent
fashion. You can't assume that increasing the
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Xuân Baldauf
xuan--2009.03--submitbug--support--postgresql@baldauf.org wrote:
Well, while this behaviour is well-known for PostgreSQL, this is actually an
abuse of syntax. If there are legitimate requirements for rewriting a table,
then there should be
