> > [ fix broken CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS macro ]
>
> Applied. I see how this might change detection of
> statement_timeout, but I do not actually see what it's got to
> do with deadlock detection.
> In the deadlock situation the process that needs to wake up
> is going to be blocked on a semaphor
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> How does this fix that case?
> It doesn't. This is why the second version of the patch was required,
> per http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-09/msg00039.php.
Okay, I've applied the right version of the patch now ;-)
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ fix broken CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS macro ]
Applied. I see how this might change detection of statement_timeout,
but I do not actually see what it's got to do with deadlock detection.
In the deadlock situation the process that needs to wake up is goin
