Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Not a problem there. I walked around the code for a bit, made a few
> hacks to see how things are working, and I can tell you strait up that
> if you'd like this by 7.3, it won't be happening from me. <:~) I'm
> stretched kinda thin as is and don't think I'll be able to
> > ::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
> > of pl/pgsql is schema un-aware (ie, all of the declarations). -sc
>
> Yeah. The group of routines parse_word, parse_dblword, etc that are
> called by the lexer certainly all need work. There are some
> definitional issues to think about, too -
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
> > of pl/pgsql is schema un-aware (ie, all of the declarations). -sc
>
> Yeah. The group of routines parse_word, parse_dblword, etc that are
> called by the lexer certainly all need wor
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
> of pl/pgsql is schema un-aware (ie, all of the declarations). -sc
Yeah. The group of routines parse_word, parse_dblword, etc that are
called by the lexer certainly all need work. There are some
definitio
> Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Call me crazy, but shouldn't the following work? :~|
>
> Sure should. Want to fix plpgsql's parser?
Why not: I've never been one to avoid strapping on 4tons in rocks and
jumping into the deep end. ::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
of
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Call me crazy, but shouldn't the following work? :~|
Sure should. Want to fix plpgsql's parser?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Us
