Clean up some code, comments and docs referring to Windows 2000 and older
This fixes and updates a couple of comments related to outdated Windows
versions. Particularly, src/common/exec.c had a fallback implementation
to read a file's line from a pipe because stdin/stdout/stderr does not
exist in
Stop demanding that top xact must be seen before subxact in decoding.
Manifested as
ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record
this check forbids legit behaviours like
- First xl_xact_assignment record is beyond reading, i.e. earlier
restart_lsn.
- After restart_lsn
Stop demanding that top xact must be seen before subxact in decoding.
Manifested as
ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record
this check forbids legit behaviours like
- First xl_xact_assignment record is beyond reading, i.e. earlier
restart_lsn.
- After restart_lsn
Stop demanding that top xact must be seen before subxact in decoding.
Manifested as
ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record
this check forbids legit behaviours like
- First xl_xact_assignment record is beyond reading, i.e. earlier
restart_lsn.
- After restart_lsn
Stop demanding that top xact must be seen before subxact in decoding.
Manifested as
ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record
this check forbids legit behaviours like
- First xl_xact_assignment record is beyond reading, i.e. earlier
restart_lsn.
- After restart_lsn
Stop demanding that top xact must be seen before subxact in decoding.
Manifested as
ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record
this check forbids legit behaviours like
- First xl_xact_assignment record is beyond reading, i.e. earlier
restart_lsn.
- After restart_lsn
Stop demanding that top xact must be seen before subxact in decoding.
Manifested as
ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record
this check forbids legit behaviours like
- First xl_xact_assignment record is beyond reading, i.e. earlier
restart_lsn.
- After restart_lsn
Remove obsolete _bt_compare() comment.
btbuild() has nothing to say about how NULL values compare in nbtree.
Besides, there are _bt_compare() header comments that describe how NULL
values are handled.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/fe9b92854e7d5f66d
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 10:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is there a reason for that to be coded in such an obscure and fragile
> fashion, rather than having the test be say "if (lt->buffer ==
> NULL)"?
I did that to match the original behavior, which is to only allocate
the read buffer if the tape is
