Fix assertion failures while processing NEW_CID record in logical decoding.
When the logical decoding restarts from NEW_CID, since there is no
association between the top transaction and its subtransaction, both are
created as top transactions and have the same LSN. This caused the
assertion failu
Fix assertion failures while processing NEW_CID record in logical decoding.
When the logical decoding restarts from NEW_CID, since there is no
association between the top transaction and its subtransaction, both are
created as top transactions and have the same LSN. This caused the
assertion failu
Fix assertion failures while processing NEW_CID record in logical decoding.
When the logical decoding restarts from NEW_CID, since there is no
association between the top transaction and its subtransaction, both are
created as top transactions and have the same LSN. This caused the
assertion failu
Fix assertion failures while processing NEW_CID record in logical decoding.
When the logical decoding restarts from NEW_CID, since there is no
association between the top transaction and its subtransaction, both are
created as top transactions and have the same LSN. This caused the
assertion failu
Fix assertion failures while processing NEW_CID record in logical decoding.
When the logical decoding restarts from NEW_CID, since there is no
association between the top transaction and its subtransaction, both are
created as top transactions and have the same LSN. This caused the
assertion failu
Fix assertion failures while processing NEW_CID record in logical decoding.
When the logical decoding restarts from NEW_CID, since there is no
association between the top transaction and its subtransaction, both are
created as top transactions and have the same LSN. This caused the
assertion failu
Fix assertion failures while processing NEW_CID record in logical decoding.
When the logical decoding restarts from NEW_CID, since there is no
association between the top transaction and its subtransaction, both are
created as top transactions and have the same LSN. This caused the
assertion failu
Better handle interrupting TAP tests
Set up a signal handler for INT/TERM so that we run our END block if we
get them. In END, if the exit status indicates a problem, call
_update_pid(-1) to improve chances of the stop working in case start()
hasn't returned yet.
Also, change END's teardown_node
Get rid of XLogCtlInsert->forcePageWrites
After commit 39969e2a1e4d, ->forcePageWrites is no longer very
interesting: we can just test whether runningBackups is different from 0.
This simplifies some code, so do away with it.
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/39969e2
Track LLVM 15 changes.
Per https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html, support for non-opaque
pointers still exists and we can request that on our context. We have
until LLVM 16 to move to opaque pointers, a much larger change.
Back-patch to 11, where LLVM support arrived.
Author: Thomas Munro
Track LLVM 15 changes.
Per https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html, support for non-opaque
pointers still exists and we can request that on our context. We have
until LLVM 16 to move to opaque pointers, a much larger change.
Back-patch to 11, where LLVM support arrived.
Author: Thomas Munro
Track LLVM 15 changes.
Per https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html, support for non-opaque
pointers still exists and we can request that on our context. We have
until LLVM 16 to move to opaque pointers, a much larger change.
Back-patch to 11, where LLVM support arrived.
Author: Thomas Munro
Track LLVM 15 changes.
Per https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html, support for non-opaque
pointers still exists and we can request that on our context. We have
until LLVM 16 to move to opaque pointers, a much larger change.
Back-patch to 11, where LLVM support arrived.
Author: Thomas Munro
Track LLVM 15 changes.
Per https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html, support for non-opaque
pointers still exists and we can request that on our context. We have
until LLVM 16 to move to opaque pointers, a much larger change.
Back-patch to 11, where LLVM support arrived.
Author: Thomas Munro
Track LLVM 15 changes.
Per https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html, support for non-opaque
pointers still exists and we can request that on our context. We have
until LLVM 16 to move to opaque pointers, a much larger change.
Back-patch to 11, where LLVM support arrived.
Author: Thomas Munro
Remove pg_backup_start_callback and reuse similar code
We had two copies of almost identical logic to revert shared memory
state when a running backup aborts; we can remove
pg_backup_start_callback if we adapt do_pg_abort_backup so that it can
be used for this purpose too.
However, in order for t
16 matches
Mail list logo
