Count write times when extending relation files for shared buffers
Relation files extended multiple blocks at a time have been counting the
number of blocks written, but forgot that to increment the write time in
this case, as write and relation extension are treated as two different
I/O
Count write times when extending relation files for shared buffers
Relation files extended by multiple blocks at a time have been counting
the number of blocks written, but forgot to increment the write time in
this case, as single-block write and relation extension are treated as
two different
Add flush option to pg_logical_emit_message()
Since its introduction, LogLogicalMessage() (via the SQL interface
pg_logical_emit_message()) has never included a call to XLogFlush(),
causing it to potentially lose messages on a crash when used in
non-transactional mode. This has come up to me as
windows: msvc: Define STDIN/OUT/ERR_FILENO.
This commit (c290e79cf0) was originally back-patched to v15.
Commit 97550c0711 added a new use of STDERR_FILENO, and it was
back-patched all the way to v11, thus breaking MSVC builds for v11
through v14. Since STDERR_FILENO is now needed on older
windows: msvc: Define STDIN/OUT/ERR_FILENO.
This commit (c290e79cf0) was originally back-patched to v15.
Commit 97550c0711 added a new use of STDERR_FILENO, and it was
back-patched all the way to v11, thus breaking MSVC builds for v11
through v14. Since STDERR_FILENO is now needed on older
windows: msvc: Define STDIN/OUT/ERR_FILENO.
This commit (c290e79cf0) was originally back-patched to v15.
Commit 97550c0711 added a new use of STDERR_FILENO, and it was
back-patched all the way to v11, thus breaking MSVC builds for v11
through v14. Since STDERR_FILENO is now needed on older
windows: msvc: Define STDIN/OUT/ERR_FILENO.
This commit (c290e79cf0) was originally back-patched to v15.
Commit 97550c0711 added a new use of STDERR_FILENO, and it was
back-patched all the way to v11, thus breaking MSVC builds for v11
through v14. Since STDERR_FILENO is now needed on older
Back-patch test cases for timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
Per code coverage reports, we had zero regression test coverage
of these functions. That came back to bite us, as apparently
that's allowed us to miss discovering misbehavior of this code
with AIX's xlc compiler. Install relevant portions of
Back-patch test cases for timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
Per code coverage reports, we had zero regression test coverage
of these functions. That came back to bite us, as apparently
that's allowed us to miss discovering misbehavior of this code
with AIX's xlc compiler. Install relevant portions of
Back-patch test cases for timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
Per code coverage reports, we had zero regression test coverage
of these functions. That came back to bite us, as apparently
that's allowed us to miss discovering misbehavior of this code
with AIX's xlc compiler. Install relevant portions of
Back-patch test cases for timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
Per code coverage reports, we had zero regression test coverage
of these functions. That came back to bite us, as apparently
that's allowed us to miss discovering misbehavior of this code
with AIX's xlc compiler. Install relevant portions of
Back-patch test cases for timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
Per code coverage reports, we had zero regression test coverage
of these functions. That came back to bite us, as apparently
that's allowed us to miss discovering misbehavior of this code
with AIX's xlc compiler. Install relevant portions of
Back-patch test cases for timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
Per code coverage reports, we had zero regression test coverage
of these functions. That came back to bite us, as apparently
that's allowed us to miss discovering misbehavior of this code
with AIX's xlc compiler. Install relevant portions of
Dodge a compiler bug affecting timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
Use a modulo operator instead of implementing the same behavior
with a loop. The loop solution is doubtless microscopically
faster for the typical case of only wrapping into the very next
day, but maybe not so much for large interval
Avoid calling proc_exit() in processes forked by system().
The SIGTERM handler for the startup process immediately calls
proc_exit() for the duration of the restore_command, i.e., a call
to system(). This system() call forks a new process to execute the
shell command, and this child process
Avoid calling proc_exit() in processes forked by system().
The SIGTERM handler for the startup process immediately calls
proc_exit() for the duration of the restore_command, i.e., a call
to system(). This system() call forks a new process to execute the
shell command, and this child process
Avoid calling proc_exit() in processes forked by system().
The SIGTERM handler for the startup process immediately calls
proc_exit() for the duration of the restore_command, i.e., a call
to system(). This system() call forks a new process to execute the
shell command, and this child process
Avoid calling proc_exit() in processes forked by system().
The SIGTERM handler for the startup process immediately calls
proc_exit() for the duration of the restore_command, i.e., a call
to system(). This system() call forks a new process to execute the
shell command, and this child process
Avoid calling proc_exit() in processes forked by system().
The SIGTERM handler for the startup process immediately calls
proc_exit() for the duration of the restore_command, i.e., a call
to system(). This system() call forks a new process to execute the
shell command, and this child process
Avoid calling proc_exit() in processes forked by system().
The SIGTERM handler for the startup process immediately calls
proc_exit() for the duration of the restore_command, i.e., a call
to system(). This system() call forks a new process to execute the
shell command, and this child process
Avoid calling proc_exit() in processes forked by system().
The SIGTERM handler for the startup process immediately calls
proc_exit() for the duration of the restore_command, i.e., a call
to system(). This system() call forks a new process to execute the
shell command, and this child process
Reword messages about impending (M)XID exhaustion.
First, we shouldn't recommend switching to single-user mode, because
that's terrible advice. Especially on newer versions where VACUUM
will enter emergency mode when nearing (M)XID exhaustion, it's
perfectly fine to just VACUUM in multi-user
Talk about assigning, rather than generating, new MultiXactIds.
The word "assign" is used in various places internally to describe what
GetNewMultiXactId does, but the user-facing messages have previously
said "generate". For consistency, standardize on "assign," which seems
(at least to me) to
23 matches
Mail list logo
