On 4/1/25 15:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 07.03.25 22:22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The new tuplesort_getgintuple() in tuplesortvariants.c has a branch
>> that does "return false" even though the function's return type is
>> GinTuple *. That is probably a mistake. Check please.
>>
>> Also, t
On 07.03.25 22:22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The new tuplesort_getgintuple() in tuplesortvariants.c has a branch that
does "return false" even though the function's return type is GinTuple
*. That is probably a mistake. Check please.
Also, this code contains a "pgrminclude ignore", but we don'
The new tuplesort_getgintuple() in tuplesortvariants.c has a branch that
does "return false" even though the function's return type is GinTuple
*. That is probably a mistake. Check please.
Also, this code contains a "pgrminclude ignore", but we don't use those
anymore.
On 03.03.25 17:10,
